Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HB2301 <br />In response to a question from Ms. Taylor, Mr. Cushman explained that part of the rationale behind the bill <br />was to discourage gang-related activity by making it essentially more onerous if a gang member was <br />convicted of certain offenses. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor objected to this reasoning. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman ascertained that there would be no second to a motion to change the recommendation and the <br />recommendation to keep the bill at ‘Priority 3 Support’ stood. <br /> <br />HB2189 <br />Mr. Cushman relayed staff’s recommendation to ‘Drop.’ He said in terms of impact on the Eugene Police <br />Department (EPD), if there was an allegation of criminal activity it would be investigated, but if it was not <br />criminal it would come under the purview of the Department of Human Services (DHS), which would be <br />tasked with investigating “likely child abuse.” <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Bettman, Ms. Wilson stated that the bill was not going into a hearing <br />soon. She felt the bill was not likely to go far as the language was enormously ambiguous. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to support the staff recommended position ‘Drop’ <br />for HB2189. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB2393 <br />Ms. Taylor wanted to oppose the legislation as she perceived requiring drivers over 70 to renew licenses <br />every two years and to take drivers’ tests as age discrimination. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor moved to change the position on HB2393 to ‘Oppose.’ The motion died for lack of <br />a second. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman observed that presently the bill was listed as one to ‘monitor.’ <br /> <br />SB283 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to support the staff position of ‘Priority 3 Sup- <br />port’ with the amendment to the bill that would indicate that the prohibition would be mandated <br />for a second or subsequent conviction of unlawful firearm storage, or if ordered by a court <br />(which would allow the action to be taken for a first offense if the court felt that the circum- <br />stances warranted such a prohibition). The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />SB298 <br />The CCIGR accepted the staff-recommended position of ‘Priority 3 Support.’ <br /> <br />SB174 <br />Mr. Cushman explained that the bill would give local law enforcement agencies access to state tax <br />information but only when an issue pertained to tax evasion. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental February 13, 2007 Page 5 <br /> Relations <br /> <br />