Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: School/Youth Services Funding <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: April 18, 2007 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Library, Recreation and Cultural Services Staff Contact: Renee Grube <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-6065 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />The purpose of the work session is to solicit City Council interest in pursuing potential revenue <br />alternatives to support local school districts and out-of-school youth services provided by the City. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />City Council Action and Litigation History <br />On November 7, 2000, Eugene voters passed Ballot Measure 20-37, a two-year, $3.5 million local <br />option tax levy to fund youth activities. The levy expired on June 30, 2003. <br /> <br />On November 5, 2002, Eugene voters passed Ballot Measure 20-67, a four-year, $0.86/$1,000 of <br />assessed value local option levy expected to raise approximately $8.0 million for youth and school- <br />based services. This levy will expire June 30, 2007. <br /> <br />The current levy was challenged in Tax Court in the Urhausen v. City of Eugene case, where the <br />petitioners asserted that the portion of the levy used to fund youth services provided by Eugene and <br />Bethel (93% of levy) school districts should be counted as part of the Measure 5 tax rate limit of $5 per <br />$1,000 of assessed value for schools rather than the general government $10 tax rate limit. On February <br />16, 2006, the Tax Court agreed with the petitioners that Measure 5 requires that a portion of the levy <br />should be counted toward the $5 limit. On August 31, 2006, the Supreme Court affirmed the Tax <br />Court’s decision that 93% of the proceeds—those dedicated to funding school-based services—should <br />be categorized as school taxes for purposes of Measure 5. This reduced the estimated net amount of the <br />levy in FY07 from $8.5 million to $6.8 million. <br /> <br />On June 26, 2006, the council held a work session on the potential of a future youth/school-based <br />services local option levy. Staff recommended not going forward with the renewal of the levy as both <br />school districts had developed alternative strategies to fund programs that were receiving levy funding. <br />This recommendation was also consistent with the discussion of the Budget Committee and the council <br />around the library local option levy. As a result, the council decided not to renew the youth/school- <br />based services levy. <br /> <br />At the state level, the Governor’s proposed budget includes $6.06 billion for K-12 schools, which is a <br />14.2% increase over 2005-07 funding levels. Each of the two local school districts has a different <br />budget situation: <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070418\S070418B.doc <br /> <br />