Laserfiche WebLink
The Broadway Place development required parking spaces for the retail and housing components of this <br />public/private partnership. The City assembled the land, built the two public garages, and sold the “air <br />rights” to the developer at a reduced rate for the construction of commercial and residential portions. (The <br />purchase of “air rights” allows the developer to develop on top of the garage.) Broadway Place also received <br />a MUPTE (10 year property tax exemption on the housing portion of the project). The City used its full faith <br />and credit pledge to issue bonds to pay for the garage. The bonds are repaid from parking revenues. The <br />City has not had to use its general resources to make debt service payments. <br />C. Public Infrastructure <br />Public Infrastructure Summary <br />Utility relocation/upgrades, transportation improvements <br />Investment in current and future developments in given area <br />Funds from a wide variety of sources <br />Public infrastructure includes streets, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, open space, pedestrian improvements, <br />utility relocations and upgrades, or transportation improvements. Cities and urban renewal agencies can <br />provide infrastructure as a means of investing in a development with the intended purpose of the <br />development being a trigger for further development in the area that will also benefit from the infrastructure <br />improvements. A variety of funds may be used to pay for the improvements, depending on the nature of the <br />project, such as SDCs, assessments, road funds, general funds, tax increment funds, and other resources. <br />Examples:Reopening of West Broadway, Courthouse District <br />A public infrastructure investment was made with the reopening West Broadway in 2002. The project <br />included the reopening of the street, pedestrian improvements, landscaping, and public art. The total <br />expenditure was $2 million. Public funds were matched with $200,000 in private contributions. <br />Additionally, the Riverfront Urban Renewal District provided funds to underground the utilities in the <br />courthouse district. <br />D. Direct Investment <br />Direct Investment <br />URA participation through a grant program <br />Funds from tax increment revenues <br />The City/URA could also directly invest in a development as a way to reduce overall cost. Funds could <br />come from various sources, but would most like come from tax increment financing. The City has not <br />chosen to use direct investment in the past. The City’s preference has been to provide loans, which revolve <br />and provide funding for additional future projects. <br />Example:No previous example. <br />3. EXAMPLES FROM EUGENE AND OTHER COMMUNITIES <br />Many communities have successfully supported downtown development through the use of public financial <br />tools. Development division staff has researched a number of downtown projects and public private <br />partnerships in Eugene and other cities. Although the goal of a vibrant, place-specific downtown was similar <br />among the communities, the amount and impact of public dollars and the overall size of the projects varied <br />widely. Brief summaries of eight examples, including 3 projects in Portland, are summarized below. (See <br />Attachment D “Case Studies” for detailed information on each project.) <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />