Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Pap~ raised concern that fraternities/sororities frequently housed more than 20 people <br />and that some people might be causing a disturbance when others were involved in more quiet <br />activities. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson reiterated Councilor Kelly's comments regarding the enforcement of <br />traditional laws regarding intoxicated minors and violations of the noise ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Fart left the meeting at 9:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson said that she had read accounts of weapons and physical assaults at <br />parties. She raised concern that people could still have disruptive parties up to four times a year <br />without incurring the penalty. She said that she would support the 20-person limit but not the 25- <br />person limit. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor supported the 25-person limit. She raised concern over penalizing people <br />because others had done bad things in the past. She reiterated that there were existing <br />penalties that would handle the situation. She related that she had been to teachers' parties that <br />had gotten loud and would fall under the ordinance. Councilor Taylor went on to say that if police <br />responded to a party and simply asked people to be more quiet the majority of them would do so. <br />She stressed her desire to do anything to make the ordinance less punitive. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman reiterated that it was only the second party in 90 days that incurred the <br />ordinance and commented that "there were a lot of ducks to put in a row" before the ordinance <br />was enforced. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey related a telephone call that he had received from a concerned citizen who was <br />going to have more than 25 guests for Thanksgiving and Christmas and was worried over the <br />potential fine that might be incurred. He said that he would support Councilor Papa's amendment <br />in the event of a tie, because of the commendable work done by the ASU©. <br /> <br /> The amendment to the amendment to the motion passed, 4:3, with <br /> councilors Meisner, Nathanson, and Bettman voting no. <br /> <br /> The amendment to the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved to amend the language <br /> of Subsection 2(a) regarding first response to add the words "...and in <br /> circumstances where the person responsible for the gathering was not the <br /> first to call the police to request assistance." <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly opined that if the goal of the ordinance was to serve as a deterrent, the positive <br />behavior should be rewarded. He added that the if the person responsible for the party was the <br />first to call the police then they should not be counted as having had a first response under the <br />proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ reiterated that it was his desire to work with the students of ASUO to find an <br />agreeable solution to the problem. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson said that staff supported the amendment. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 13, 2000 Page 13 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />