Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Nathanson stressed that calls had to be monitored minute-by-minute so that a good- <br />faith effort could be acknowledged. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson said that staff would have to rely on the 911 call center logs. <br /> <br /> The amendment passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Kelly regarding whether staff's preference was to have <br />Municipal Court deal with the first citation and a hearings official deal with appeals, or to have <br />Municipal Court handle the whole affair, Mr. Klein said that hearings officials would deal with <br />questions of whether the notice was properly served and whether the penalty assessed was <br />correct. He said that it made sense to staff to have a hearings official perform that function, but <br />noted that it would not be illegal to have the Municipal Court handle both functions. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson said that staff preferred to have Municipal Court deal with Subsection 2(b) <br />issues and the hearings official deal with Subsection 7 issues. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Rayor, moved to amend Subsection <br /> 2(b) of the ordinance to change from City Manager or designee to Eugene <br /> Municipal Court. The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor PapS, moved to amend Subsection 3 <br /> of the ordinance to change the language "The special response fee is <br /> defined as the total cost incurred by the City in connection with the response" <br /> to "defined as the total cost incurred by the City caused by the response." <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Rayor, seconded by Councilor PapS, moved to amend the motion <br /> by adding a sentence to Subsection 6 of the ordinance stating "A full refund <br /> for funds paid by the individual notice recipient will be issued to the notice <br /> recipient who has paid any portion of the special response fee assessed <br /> pursuant to Subsection 3 if the person can demonstrate that all persons cited <br /> or arrested at the gathering for which the fee has been assessed were <br /> acquitted in court. For purposes of this section the definition of acquitted <br /> does not include cases that were dismissed pursuant to the successful <br /> completion of a diversion program." The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor PapS, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the motion <br /> by changing subsections 3 and 4(c) from 90 days to 60 days. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap8 noted that the ASUO request was to change the time to 21 days. He opined that <br />60 days was more appropriate. He raised concern that so much of the discussion was centered <br />on the University area but said that he had made his amendment to try and strike a compromise <br />with the ASUO. <br /> <br />Councilor Rayor called for information on other exclusion ordinances and the time limits enforced <br />by them to see if 90 days was comparable. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 13, 2000 Page 14 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />