Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Solomon said she hoped the bill would pass and would have an effect on the City. She stated that <br />the Bethel School District owned land outside of the UGB of Eugene and it needed to build a new high <br />school. She averred that the bill, which was specific to the Hood River County school district, could set a <br />precedent that would benefit the Bethel School District. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asserted that the bill was inconsistent to the legislative agenda of Eugene. She averred <br />that the Bethel School District could apply for a local exception to the statewide land use requirements. She <br />felt the bill would set “a very bad precedent.” She urged the council to uphold the vote of the CCIGR. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka concurred. He believed it was a bad precedent and a bad policy. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark related that he had heard the concern expressed that such votes create conflict between <br />public good and public bad. He suggested that the bill was an opportunity to remedy this. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote on whether to support the recommendation of the Council Committee on <br />Intergovernmental Relations to take a position of Priority 2 Oppose was a tie, 4:4; councilors <br />Zelenka, Ortiz, Taylor and Bettman voting in favor and councilors Solomon, Poling, Clark and <br />Pryor voting in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in favor of the recommendation and it passed. <br /> <br />SB 293 <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor stated that a number of bills that related to the use of mobile communication while driving <br />had been generated this session, of which this bill was one. He pulled the bill because staff expressed <br />concerns that the bill did not exempt the use of two-way radios by police, emergency personnel, and public <br />works staff. He said the CCIGR voted to support the bill with the amendment to provide that exemption. <br />He suggested that the council pull the bill for later approval when a more current version came out. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson interjected that she believed SB 293 was now a “dead” bill. She predicted that the Legislature <br />would focus on distracted driving as a whole issue rather than “nitpicking” each activity. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy ascertained that there was no objection to dropping the motion. <br /> <br />HB 2140 <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor explained that the bill made technical changes to public contracting code. He said major <br />revisions of public contracting had been undertaken one year earlier. He stated that the bill would add <br />language for contracting with government agencies, changing bid thresholds and limiting certain kinds of <br />contracts. He related that staff felt that the bill was primarily a clean-up of wording and that it added <br />clarifications to the revisions. He said both Mr. Perry of the Finance Division and Mr. Klope of Public <br />Works had recommended that the City support the bill. The CCIGR voted 2:1 to oppose it. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman affirmed that the bill made “alleged housekeeping changes” but she felt the changes were <br />very significant in terms of public policy. She said one would change the quote limit for transportation <br />projects from $50,000 to $100,000. She thought this would make so that anything that was under $100,000 <br />would not need to go out for a competitive bid. She also took issue with language regarding pilot projects. <br />She asserted that it circumvented public accountability, as any project could be called a pilot project. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 12, 2007 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />