Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Solomon asked staff to verify if the bill would change the language so that a project for $100,000 <br />or less could not be subjected to the bid process. Mr. Klein replied that if it worked like the rest of the code, <br />it referred to the minimum and not the maximum; in other words, the bid process would be optional for a <br />project at that level. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon surmised that the City of Eugene could still require contracts to be bid out. She <br />supported the idea. She felt pilot projects were ways of exploring a different way of doing business. She <br />believed it to be a way to try something new without having to “cement it into an ordinance.” She averred <br />that it was worth a try. She supported having more tools at the table that would help to save money. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said he wanted to support inventive ways of doing things in order to find cost savings in the <br />process. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor said if one looked at Public Works law it was apparent that projects that cost $100,000 or <br />less were already exempted from the bid requirements, with the exception of transportation projects. He <br />explained that the bill sought to bring transportation projects in line with the rest of the public works <br />projects. He disputed the notion that the bill sought to “somehow monkey with the limit.” He agreed that <br />pilot projects encouraged innovation and were not mechanisms to “do things underhandedly.” He thought <br />such projects were opportunities to be creative in procurement. He underscored that the laws from one year <br />earlier had been put in place in part to improve the monitoring and thresholds. He believed the bill <br />represented good changes to the contracting laws. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka felt that the law indicated that all that had to be shown was a belief that a pilot project <br />would save money. He thought the bill was written so broadly that anything could be considered a pilot <br />project. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy was not convinced that the bill was onerous. She indicated she would oppose the position the <br />CCIGR had taken. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote to support the recommendation of the Council Committee on Intergov- <br />ernmental Relations to take a position to change the recommendation on HB 2140 to Priority 2 <br />Oppose was a tie, 4:4; councilors Ortiz, Zelenka, Taylor, and Bettman voting in favor and <br />councilors Pryor, Poling, Solomon, and Clark voting in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in op- <br />position and the staff recommendation of Priority 3 Support stood. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor noted that it was late in Washington, DC, and signed off. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor reiterated his belief that a close vote on CCIGR recommendation warranted a larger <br />discussion at the council level. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka commented that the CCIGR minutes were somewhat difficult to understand. He asked <br />for a bill summary to aid in understanding what the bills were. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor stated that the CCIGR was presented with a large stack of bills and in most cases the staff <br />recommendation was accepted. <br /> <br /> <br />5. ACTION: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 12, 2007 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />