Laserfiche WebLink
project. Risk is also mitigated by using a 1.5 times debt coverage ratio and a debt service reserve <br />fund. The financings, however, are not risk free, even with these protections in place. Tax <br />increment revenue is less predictable than the City’s property tax revenues, and therefore, urban <br />renewal borrowings are considered more risky than general City borrowings. The protections <br />built into preliminary finance plan provide a cushion in the event that any adverse event reduces <br />urban renewal revenues, such as one of the major taxpayers in the district relocates outside of the <br />district, other property values significantly decrease, or in the case of a recession and the <br />subsequent failure of businesses in the district. <br />BEDI Grant Funds:HUD has awarded the City a $2 million Brownfields Economic <br />Development Initiative Grant. This grant must be used in connection with a HUD Section 108 <br />Loan. It is assumed that the property acquisition and other site related costs qualify as eligible <br />projects for the HUD Section 108 Loan. <br />Urban Renewal Cash: The cash balances in the urban renewal funds, plus cash that <br />becomes available over the next few years, would be used to pay for development costs. <br />Downtown Revitalization Loan Program:A portion of a potential affordable housing <br />loan to the developers could be made from the DRLP. The remainder of the DRLP funds could <br />be used to assist with the cost of purchasing the turnkey garage. Once this development project <br />is complete, the DRLP can resume making loans from the revolving loan fund payments. <br /> HOME Funds: This preliminary plan assumes $800,000 of HOME funds are used to <br />make an affordable housing loan to the developers.Each year the City issues a Request for <br />Proposals (RFP) for the development of low-income housing projects. HOME funds are the <br />largest resource for funding affordable housing and the City typically allocates about $800,000 <br />of HOME funds each year for housing development. RFP responses are reviewed by the <br />Housing Policy Board and staff. The HPB recommends projects to receive HOME funding and <br />other resources to the council for their consideration. The RFP is generally issued in late fall <br />and council typically takes action by June of the following year. <br />General Funds/General Fund Guarantees: In this example finance plan, there would <br />be a small contribution from the City’s general funds for the project. An alternative would be for <br />the urban renewal agency to take on a higher level of debt, but that debt would be also guar- <br />anteed by the City’s full faith & credit. These decisions do not have to be made until the City is <br />ready to purchase the turnkey garage. A number of factors may change between now and that <br />time. <br />Uses of Funds <br />Property Acquisition and other Site-Related Costs: The City would either purchase the <br />property and re-sell to the developers at a lower cost or provide a payment to reduce the cost to <br />the developers of purchasing the properties. It also includes the cost of options to purchase the <br />properties. In addition,KWG’s initial submission indicated that it would like for the City to pay <br />for utility off-site costs and a buy down for profit. In order to simplify the transaction, these <br /> <br />