Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />City Hall Complex Preliminary Funding Options <br /> <br />Funding Options <br /> <br /> <br />There are three funding options presented in this analysis for three different scales of project, all <br />of which are funded with internal resources plus General Obligation (“G.O.”) Bonds. These <br />funding options correspond to the estimated project costs of options that will be presented to the <br />council at the workshop. <br /> <br />At this point, council does not need to make a decision on the specific funding plan for the City <br />Hall Complex projects. In order to move forward with the next activities in the City Hall com- <br />plex master plan process, however, council should make a choice about the approximate scale of <br />the project to be taken forward for more analysis. This very preliminary funding plan is pro- <br />vided to give council information to inform the choice about the project scale. <br /> <br />The following chart summarizes a very preliminary funding option for three different scales of <br /> <br />project. The specific funding items are described following the chart. <br /> <br />City Hall Complex <br />Preliminary Funding Options <br />$ in millions <br /> Option A Option B Option C <br />General Obligation Bonds $130 $110 $90 <br />Internal Resources <br /> Facility Reserve $30 $30 $30 <br /> Limited Tax Bonds 10 10 10 <br /> Asset Sales 0 – 2 0 – 2 0 – 2 <br /> Other Miscellaneous Sources 0 – 8 0 – 8 0 – 8 <br /> Total Internal Resources $40 – 50 $40 – 50 $40 – 50 <br /> Totals $170 – 180 $150 – 160 $130 – 140 <br /> <br /> <br />General Obligation Bonds: <br /> Based on the City’s adopted financial management goals and poli- <br />cies, voter-approved G.O. bonds would be an appropriate funding source for the projects. The <br />policies state that G.O. bonds are to be used for major capital construction or improvements in <br />support of general municipal services. <br /> <br />G.O. bonds must be approved by voters, and approval is subject to the double-majority provi- <br />sions of Measure 50. G.O. bonds are repaid with a property tax levy that is outside of Measure <br />5’s tax rate limits. The uses of G.O. bonds are limited to construction expenses and may not be <br />used for certain other kinds of expenses, such as freestanding equipment, temporary relocation, <br />or moving costs. <br /> <br />The next election that is not subject to the double-majority is in November 2008. The City could <br />ask voters for approval to issue G.O. Bonds to fund the portion of the City Hall Complex pro- <br />jects beyond what is available with internal resources. <br /> <br /> <br />