Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />Impact on Debt Burden and Debt Policies <br /> <br /> <br />It is also essential to examine the impact of the bonding proposals on the City’s debt burden. <br />The chart below sets out the impact of each of the proposals against the City’s debt policy limit <br />of 1.0% of debt to real market value, assuming that the debt is issued in FY09. As shown below, <br />all of the options would result in a debt burden that is within the policy limits. <br /> <br />Net Direct Debt Debt to Real <br />GO Bonds Limited Tax Outstanding in Market Value <br />$ in millions Issued Bonds Issued FY09 in FY09 <br />Option A $130 $10 $183 0.81% <br />Option B $110 $10 $163 0.72% <br />Option C $90 $10 $143 0.63% <br /> <br />Operating and Maintenance Costs <br /> <br /> <br />Although not part of the plan for financing the capital costs, it is important to include the esti- <br />mated operating and maintenance costs for the new building. The Multi-Year Financial Plan <br />includes a preliminary estimate of the ongoing O&M costs for a City Hall renovation or replace- <br />ment at about $2.3 million. However, this figure does not reflect the reduction in O&M costs <br />attributable to existing City office space that would be vacated and surplused under the various <br />consolidation options being considered. The actual net increase in O&M costs would depend on <br />the scale of the project undertaken. <br /> <br />Given the City’s structural budget imbalance, there is no obvious source of funding for a new <br />ongoing commitment of General Fund dollars of any net increase in O&M costs. If the council <br />decides to authorize construction of this project, and assuming no change in the health of the <br />General Fund, a future year budget process may have to reallocate existing General Fund dollars <br />to the net increase in O&M on this facility. Further analysis will be conducted as the consolida- <br />tion options are narrowed and studied further. <br /> <br />