Laserfiche WebLink
asked to reconsider the issue and add language that expressed support for the concept while <br />continuing to oppose an unfunded mandate. The council agreed that the committee would <br />reconsider the issue at its February 23 meeting. <br /> <br /> The motion to amend passed, 5:1, Mr. Rayor voting no. <br /> <br />3.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WEST EUGENE WETLANDS PLAN BY <br /> ADOPTING PLANNED TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR WETLAND DESIGNATIONS <br /> FOR CITY PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST 18TM AVENUE AND WEST 11TM <br /> AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, AND POSSIBLE FINAL ACTION <br /> <br />City Manager Jim Johnson introduced the item, noting that Planning Division staff was present to <br />answer questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor declared a conflict of interest and left the dias because he was involved in the <br />preliminary design plans for West 11th Avenue through his employment. <br /> <br />Neil Bj0rklund, Planning and Development Department, said that the amendments before the <br />council were quasi-judicial in nature because they addressed two specific sites. The two sites <br />totaled half an acre; one site was on West 18th Avenue between Bertelsen and Willow Creek <br />roads, and the other site was on the north side of West 11th Avenue between Danebo and <br />Arrowsmith roads. Mr. Bj0rklund said that the amendments were not related to the proposed <br />West Eugene Parkway. <br /> <br />Mr. BjOrklund reviewed the criteria for approval of a refinement plan amendment: 1) the <br />amendment must be consistent with the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan; 2) <br />the amendment must be consistent with the remaining portions of the refinement plan, in this <br />case the West Eugene Wetlands Plan; and 3) the amendment must meet one or more of the <br />following: a) it must address an error in the publication of the plan, b) a change in circumstances <br />in a substantial manner not anticipated in the plan, c) the incorporation into the plan of new <br />inventory material that relates to a Statewide goal, or d) a change in public policy. Mr. BjOrklund <br />said that the Eugene Planning Commission had evaluated the plan against those criteria, and <br />any public testimony or subsequent appeal should be focused on the criteria. He noted the <br />amendments must be approved by the Lane County Board of County Commissioners, which <br />would take action after the council took action. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Kelly, Mr. BjOrklund explained that mitigation for any wetland <br />impact was governed by State and federal law. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee asked if the Planning Commission's recommendation was unanimous. Planning Director <br />Jan Childs said yes. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. There being no one present to speak, he closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson announced that the council would consider Council Bill 4679, an ordinance to <br />amend the West Eugene Wetlands Plan by adopting planned transportation corridor wetland <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 22, 1999 Page 4 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />