Laserfiche WebLink
Polly Nelson, PO Box 50426, Eugene, Southern District Coordinator of the American Civil <br />Liberties Union, said that her organization continued to oppose the ordinances but supported <br />extending the sunset for a two-year period as a meaningful and appropriate way to provide time <br />for data gathering and a thoughtful evaluation. She said that there was other data the City might <br />want to consider; for example, if someone was excluded from the mall and then violated the <br />exclusion and was convicted of criminal trespassing, how does that person appear in the data? <br />Information about racial or ethnic background and economic status would also be useful. Ms. <br />Nelson noted the ACLU's opposition to the inclusion of the mall rules in the ordinance. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln Street, #306, objected to the piping of classical music on the mall. <br />He said that people liken downtown to a park, but people can sit down in a park. He related an <br />anecdotal incident about harassment of a pregnant woman by the Downtown Guides, who he <br />claimed refused to allow her to sit. He termed the ordinances a "slippery slope to fascism" and <br />said people have a right to be on the mall and to sit on benches. He suggested that classism <br />was involved in the issue and said that the mall was not just for businesses. <br /> <br />David Hinkley, 1308 Jefferson Street, supported the council's proposed two-year sunset of the <br />ordinances. He opposed both ordinances, suggesting that they were a start of a "slippery slope." <br />Mr. Hinkley said that he did not support anti-social behavior, and when such behavior violated <br />the law, people involved should not be excluded but should be arrested and jailed. He suggested <br />that for $1 million the City could build a 80-bed tent jail to house miscreants. Mr. Hinkley said <br />that the mall was a public thoroughfare and he did not support closing streets and public ways. <br /> <br />Ali Emami, 941 Willamette Street, said he owned two businesses in downtown. He said he <br />became a citizen to enjoy the civil rights of the United States. He did not think civil rights <br />included people urinating in his doorway or the adjacent alley, or people etching $2,000 windows. <br />Mr. Emami said the Broadway curfew did not improve things for the Willamette Street section of <br />downtown but had shifted problems there. He supported the revised ordinances but said if the <br />problem shifted around it would not be possible to impose martial law on the whole downtown. <br />Mr. Emami said that while property owners monitored the inside of buildings with alarms, property <br />owners needed police patrol and enforcement outside. He suggested that the police set up video <br />cameras in the area to monitor problems, and that the City impose heavy fines on those found <br />guilty of vandalism and crime downtown. <br /> <br />Russ Brink, Downtown Eugene, Inc., 132 East Broadway, Suite 103, said that the problems on <br />the mall were not the youth congregated there, but rather that people did not come downtown <br />and did not recognize the importance of a healthy downtown. Mr. Brink said that Eeugene should <br />have a vibrant downtown it could be proud of rather than a downtown that was largely avoided by <br />its own residents. He urged the council to show leadership and bring change about in downtown. <br />He said that the council should not spend a great deal of time on the ordinances, which he <br />considered relatively minor to the overall picture. He said the ordinances were tools that <br />appeared to be effective and should be passed, but they were just tools. <br /> <br />Randy Prince, PO Box 927, opposed the ordinances. He said that they should not be a single <br />agenda item as there were two issues involved; whether public access to public properties <br />should be closed at certain hours, and whether people should be excluded from downtown based <br />on their status as unconvicted criminals. He said that the only thing connecting the two <br />ordinances were the area concerned and the people the ordinances were targeted at. Mr. Prince <br />said the same unconstitutional motives were behind both ordinances. Regarding the exclusion <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 22, 1999 Page 7 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />