Laserfiche WebLink
the parks had worked, including how many exclusion notices have been issued, how many <br />citations for curfew violations been issued, and for how many years. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor said that the issue was a very difficult one. He noted changes made to improve the <br />ordinances by the council. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said that the intent of her questions was to ensure that there were good <br />responses to issues raised in public testimony. She noted her previous support for the <br />ordinances and indicated she had not changed her support. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey noted that the council would take final action on the issue on March 8. He briefly <br />recessed the meeting at 9 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 9:05 p.m. <br /> <br />6.ACTION: APPROVAL OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br />David Reinhard of the Public Works Department reminded the council it held a public hearing on <br />the agenda item on February 8,1999. The meeting packet included responses to issues raised at <br />that time. He referred to page 28 of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and noted a <br />correction regarding the Broadway- Charnelton parking garage construction, saying it should be <br />deleted because the project had already been completed. He recommended that the council <br />adopt the ClP with the changes recommended by the Planning Commission and Budget <br />Committee. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said that she had been under the impression that staff would be recommending <br />the ClP be amended with language regarding the sidewalk program. Mr. Reinhard noted that the <br />Budget Committee had not recommended funding the program. Ms. Nathanson offered the <br />following text: 'Missing sidewalks segments will be completed as possible considering cost and <br />benefit, especially where a sidewalk is not available on a collector or arterial or on at least one <br />side of a local street." She said that such language would authorize projects not currently funded <br />for which money may be available in the future. City Attorney Glenn Klein indicated that it would <br />be appropriate to include such language in the CIP, which authorized projects but did not provide <br />fiscal authorization. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, to adopt the Capital <br /> Improvement Program for fiscal years 2000-2005, with the modifications <br /> recommended by the Planning Commission and Budget Committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly moved, seconded by Ms. Taylor, to amend the motion by deferring <br /> the $300,000 line for Airport automobile parking expansion project until fiscal <br /> year 2002, and to further direct staff to explore use of these or other funds to <br /> help provide public transportation to the airport, both door-to-door and from <br /> the downtown Lane Transit District station. <br /> <br />Responding to a request for input from Mr. Lee, Mr. Reinhard said that the expansion project was <br />included in the prior CIP and the existing Airport Master Plan. The council's review of the new <br />master plan would give it another opportunity to discuss the project. He pointed out that <br />construction was not proposed until 2001. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 22, 1999 Page 9 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />