Laserfiche WebLink
in the scheduled time. He said that if the Year 2000 issue was a serious issue, the council <br />needed time for discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that the City could not rely on the Neighborhood Leaders Council to <br />communicate the City's's information about preparedness given the limitations of the existing <br />Neighborhood Program. He said that if the issue was serious, the City must take responsibility. <br />Mr. Meisner said the City needed to communicate what the City as a government was <br />responsible for, how it could assist individual citizens, where the interface between government <br />and the citizens exist, and where other support services could be found. He said the City also <br />needed to reach beyond those who owned computers or called staff for information to overcome <br />rampant rumors. Mr. Weiler responded that the City would not rely solely on the Neighborhood <br />Program to communicate the information; there was more than a dozen avenues of <br />communication that would be used. He said that Mr. Meisner's points about responsibility were <br />well-taken, and the plan was focused on those things that the City had direct control over. Mr. <br />Meisner emphasized the need for continued clear communication "where people are." <br /> <br />Mr. Farr thanked staff for the presentation. He said that the City needed to educate people to <br />make reasonable and prudent plans. He asked if the City could provide a template for meeting <br />and action to smaller, informal neighborhood groups that could be made available at the Lane <br />County Fair or mailed to residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap8 said the City needed to communicate in a balanced way what it was doing to both avert <br />and prepare for disaster. He encouraged staff to communicate with the residents in conjunction <br />with EWEB given that citizens were probably more concerned about EWEB's ability to deliver <br />power and water than the City's ability to deliver some of its services. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr and Mr. Rayor left the meeting at 1:34 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap8 asked about testing schedules for Year 2000. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson left the meeting at 1:35 p.m. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that unlike some, she believed that residents were being "over communicated" on <br />the subject of Year 2000. She did not think there was anyone who was not aware of the problem <br />and possibly more frightened then they needed to be. She believed that residents would be <br />"bombarded" with messages about Year 2000 from a variety of sources and expressed doubt that <br />the proposed funding for City communications was necessary. Ms. Taylor agreed with Mr. Pap8 <br />that the majority of citizens would be more concerned about EWEB than the City. She <br />encouraged staff to pursue a practical and cooperative approach to the Year 2000 situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey agreed with Ms. Taylor that residents would be inundated with information. He said <br />that did not mean the City should not be involved in communicating with citizens, but it was not <br />unreasonable to go to the electronic and published media and request that those organizations <br />join the City in a meeting to develop a means of communication with residents. Mr. Torrey said <br />that he would like to see a statement from Lane County as to what it would specifically be <br />responsible for given, that every resident of Eugene was a resident of Lane County. He also <br />wanted to know what the State of Oregon would be responsible for. He wanted to ensure that <br />the National Guard was on alert in case it was needed. Mr. Torrey asked what the federal <br />government was responsible for. He encouraged staff to bring all those parties together. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:38 p.m. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 24, 1999 Page 10 <br />11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />