Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lee said he would support the motion, calling it a good compromise. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Mr. Farr, Mr. Johnson said the committee would conduct its business <br />with staff present to answer questions and add to the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he would also support the motion, reminding the council that the fund raising <br />campaign would be conducted entirely by members of the public. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Taylor, Ms. Dellenback said she supported the amendment to <br />the motion. <br /> <br /> The motion to amend passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor clarified that while he remained uncomfortable with fund raising, he believed that the <br />citizens would appreciate the opportunity to contribute. <br /> <br /> The main motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> IV. WORK SESSION: NEW LIBRARY EXPANSION/LEASE SPACE <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson introduced the topic and referred to information at the councilors' places. He <br />reminded the council that at its January 20 meeting staff had suggested using lease dollars from <br />the Administrative Service Department, Information Service Division, and the Library, Recreation <br />and Cultural Services Department to generate the cash flow for bonds. He said that a staff <br />analysis reviewed is contained in the table in question. Mr. Johnson reviewed the table and said <br />staff's recommendation is to use the proceeds from the sale of the Sears building and the old <br />library to help cover the cost of the expansion. He said that by allocating the assets for this <br />particular purpose, the council will forego any other uses for the building and also foregoing a <br />revenue stream that could be used for a future City Hall or for City office space. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Ms. Taylor, Mr. Johnson said the bond would be for 20 years. She <br />expressed concern about selling the old Sears building, calling it a valuable property downtown <br />that the City could use for many things. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said she agreed with the staff recommendation except with selling the Sears <br />building, specifically because of its location. She urged a broader discussion including the <br />building's potential future uses and asked for more options. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner reminded the council that the Sears building was owned by the Urban Renewal <br />Agency, and was part of the assets that the agency can only use for the specific purposes <br />identified in the Downtown Urban Renewal District Plan. <br /> <br />At Mr. Lee's request, City Attorney Glenn Klein explained that a year ago the council adopted an <br />ordinance identifying the library as the "one new project," although the agency's assets would be <br />used for other downtown projects it adopted earlier. He added that the council could revise that <br />ordinance, subject to limitations on "maximum indebtedness." Such a revision, he explained, <br />would involve a long process that could lead to referendum. If there were another resource, the <br />City could buy the building from the Urban Renewal Agency and use it however it saw fit. <br /> <br />Minutes-Eugene City Council March 8, 1999 Page 4 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />