Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Farr said he believed that expansion space should be built into the new library and it should <br />be done now. He pointed out that the new library will increase library use "even without growth in <br />the City of Eugene." He expressed support for the staff recommendation, saying he cannot see a <br />"cleaner method" of funding the expansion at this time. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Mr. Lee, Mr. Johnson said the proposed motion included a third part- <br />-about $750,000 annually set aside to handle additional growth in service demands--a portion of <br />which would be used if necessary. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Mr. Lee, Mr. Klein confirmed that the Sears building <br />could be leased to another entity with proceeds going to the library. He said he would have to <br />review the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan to give a more definitive answer. He added that if the <br />building were involved in a long-term lease, the proceeds may be limited to authorized downtown <br />urban renewal projects. At minimum, any lease payments would become assets of the Urban <br />Renewal Agency. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson said that in order to lease the building at fair market value, it would require a costly <br />renovation. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap8 ascertained that the building and the half block across the street were purchased for <br />library use and cost the City approximately $900,000. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said it was important to understand that the value of the property now is the value <br />of the open land where the new library will be built, plus the Sears building and the parking lot <br />east of it. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Mr. PapS, Lew Bowers, Planning and Development Department, said <br />the current value of the property purchased by the Urban Renewal Agency, if sold, would realize <br />about $1.4 to $1.7 million. In response to a follow-up question, Mr. Bowers said taxes are based <br />on use of the building and it was currently generating tax revenue. Mr. Pap8 said he was not in <br />favor of the City or public entities speculating on real estate by retaining the building. He added <br />that he was also opposed to the third part of the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor agreed with Mr. PapS's position, saying that retaining the building would make the <br />proposal "fiscally unbalanced." <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson pointed out that the figures were estimates and the City may not be able to afford to <br />build the new library (with or without the expansion space) without the sale of assets. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he was concerned about other facility needs of the City, e.g., a new City Hall, <br />and about revenue associated with those needs. He said he was prepared to support the staff <br />recommendation under the following conditions: 1) ask the committee for an update on funding <br />efforts in 90 days, and build the library anyway; and 2) be prepared to sell the assets, but ensure <br />that the uses are consistent with the City's goals. Mayor Torrey said he was convinced that a <br />trade for assets of equal value could be brokered. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson noted the creative ideas that have surfaced during this discussion and said she <br />felt as though she were being pushed into a decision without having reviewed the broad range of <br />options for the Sears building. She acknowledged that with a good analysis, she may decide the <br />best thing to do is turn it over to a private entity for redevelopment, along with other City property <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council March 8, 1999 Page 5 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />