My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5303
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2020 No. 5286-5314
>
Resolution No. 5303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2020 1:42:25 PM
Creation date
6/26/2020 1:35:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/22/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene -Springfield Area Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />4. Risk and Vulnerability <br />The highest risk areas identified were the south hills of Eugene and southeast hills of <br />Springfield. The report identified existing structures located on deep landslides as the <br />primary landslide hazard in the study area. Report recommendations included: <br />Increased public outreach for property owners to heighten awareness of the <br />hazard and precautions needed, through mitigation, to reduce the risk posed by <br />landslides; <br />• Incorporate landslide hazard maps and risk reduction strategies into community <br />planning efforts; and <br />Create a landslide emergency response plan to better prepare and react to a <br />landslide occurrence. <br />Over the course of the next five years Emergency Management and Planning staff will <br />analyze the study to determine areas and buildings at risk from landslides and propose <br />comprehensive land use policies and construction standards accordingly. <br />4.7.4 Lifelines and Critical Bridge Evaluations <br />In 2017 the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has asked Lane County to <br />complete these two tasks: <br />1. Review locations of seismically vulnerable bridges along the ODOT lifelines <br />and identify alternate routes that can be used if an earthquake occurs before the <br />necessary bridge work is completed. Assess the feasibility, seismic vulnerability <br />and corrective cost of these alternate routes. <br />2. Identify local lifelines and assess corrective costs of any vulnerable bridges. <br />Prioritize the replacement/rehab work to remove seismic vulnerabilities in a <br />reasonable timeline. There will be priorities placed on bridges along these <br />routes needing retrofitting or replacement. Some of these bridges can be <br />avoided using alternate routes, saving money for other bridges that cannot be <br />avoided. (See the Lane County Bridge Resiliency in the Event of an Earthquake <br />Study, by the Engineering and Construction Services Division 41112017) <br />The Cities of Eugene and Springfield understand the main ODOT routes in our area are <br />Hwy 58 to I-5; which will be critical lifelines during a Cascadia event. However, just as <br />critical will be the need to get equipment, personnel, and supplies from these routes to <br />the City's internal transportation routes, supplying our Points of Distribution and <br />Staging Areas. To this end we selected the bridges for upgrades to the ODOT routes. <br />The Cities of Eugene and Springfield can support each other in many ways, but without <br />these critical lifeline bridges we are virtually cut off from one another. The most glaring <br />example is the only two major hospitals that support the area reside in the City of <br />Springfield. This alone will put more than 165,000 people without access to a major <br />medical facility. <br />4-21 January 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.