Laserfiche WebLink
Eugene -Springfield Area Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />2. Hazard Descriptions <br />• Except for natural systems, all sectors are extremely sensitive to a <br />magnitude 9.0 CSZ earthquake incident. <br />• Very little has been done to prepare any systems, infrastructure, or personnel <br />to handle the initial impact and ongoing response and recovery from a CSZ <br />incident. <br />• Exceedingly limited staff availability in the aftermath of a severe earthquake <br />will create problems and challenges difficult to predict or mitigate. <br />• Every sector will experience substantial failures and interruptions unfamiliar <br />to the area and therefore difficult (though possible) to plan for. <br />• Very few Eugene and Springfield residents have first- hand experience with <br />a major earthquake, making it difficult to describe the potential experience <br />and results. <br />Additional system vulnerability details are included in Section 4 as part of the 2014 <br />Climate and Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Report. <br />In 2007, the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) <br />completed a rapid visual screening (RVS) of educational and emergency facilities in <br />communities across Oregon, as directed by the Oregon legislature in Senate Bill 2 <br />(2005). RVS is atechnique, used by the Federal Emergency Management Agency <br />(FEMA), known as FEMA 154, to identify, inventory, and rank a building's <br />potential vulnerability to seismic incidents. DOGAMI surveyed a total of 3,349 <br />buildings, giving each a low, moderate, high, or very high rating for collapse <br />potential from a high magnitude earthquake. The RVS assessed a total of 174 <br />buildings in the Eugene -Springfield area. 30 <br />It is important to note these rankings represent a probability of collapse based on <br />limited observed and analytical data and are therefore approximate rankings. To <br />fully assess a building's collapse potential, a detailed engineering study completed <br />by a qualified professional is required, but the RVS study can help prioritize which <br />buildings to survey. <br />Table 2-2 shows the number of Oregon education and emergency services buildings <br />surveyed in Eugene and Springfield with their respective rankings. Based on the <br />RVS study, Eugene and Springfield performed further seismic evaluations on much <br />of their critical infrastructure. These more detailed assessments resulted in a <br />prioritized list of facilities in need of seismic retrofits. Several of these sites have <br />already undergone seismic retrofitting work, and funding for more projects is being <br />actively pursued. <br />30 United States. State of Oregon Department of Geologic and Mineral Industries. Statewide Seismic <br />Needs Assessment: Implementation of Oregon 2005 Senate Bill 2 Relating to Public Safety, <br />Earthquakes, and Seismic Rehabilitation ofPublic Buildings. May 22, 2007. Accessed August 2019. <br />httos://www.oregongeoiogv.org/rvs/default.htm <br />2-17 January 2020 <br />