My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord. 20640
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2020 No. 20625 - 20644
>
Ord. 20640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2020 11:45:35 AM
Creation date
10/22/2020 11:43:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
10/12/2020
Document_Number
20640
CMO_Effective_Date
11/20/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
No existen anotaciones en esta página.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS <br />3.5.3.6Runway Protection Zone <br />For the protection of people and property on the ground, the FAA has identified an area of land located <br />off each runway end as the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). The size of these zones varies according to the <br />design aircraft characteristics, visual approaches, and the lowest instrument approach visibility minimum <br />defined for each runway. <br /> <br />It is desirable to have all areas within the RPZ cleared and owned by the Airport. The Runway 16R, 34L, <br />and 34R RPZs are all clear of incompatible land uses. Portions of Taxiways A, J, and L fall within the <br />Runway 34L RPZ but are under airport control. The northern portion of the Runway 16L RPZ has a <br />recreational facility that includes a golf course, driving range, pro shop and auto parking. It also has two <br />public use roads (Green Hill Road and State Highway 99) and the BNSF railroad going through the area. <br /> <br />In 2012, FAA updated guidance on the appropriate land uses within an RPZ. This update lists buildings, <br />recreational land use, public roads and rail facilities as incompatible land uses. However, the policy’s <br />intention is to address the introduction of new or modified land uses and as such, because the <br />recreational facility, roads and railroad existed prior to the 2012 guidance, they are acceptable and do not <br />require relocation. The Airport should maintain communication with the FAA Regional Office and Airport <br />District Office to protect against, and remove or mitigate the risk of, any existing incompatible land uses <br />within the RPZ as practical. Eugene Airport owns the land within the RPZs with the exception of 4.1 acres <br />of the Runway 16R RPZ (Figure 3-3) and 9.6 acres of the Runway 16L RPZ (Figure 3-4). It is <br />recommended that the Airport acquire the unowned land within the RPZs in order to have control over <br />the land use of these areas. Additionally, this land could then be leased back to the current owners until <br />such future time that the current owners no longer desire to use the property as it is currently being used. <br />At the very least, an avigation easement should be obtained. Controlling the land in order to meet FAA <br />requirements achieves the added benefit of preventing new noise sensitive land uses from being <br />introduced near the Airport. <br /> <br />EUGENE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 3-13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.