Laserfiche WebLink
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES <br />4.5.2.3 Terminal Alternatives Evaluation <br />Brief descriptions and high-level evaluations of the benefits and challenges for each family of terminal <br />alternative concept are shown to the right of the early concept figures. The three most promising <br />concepts were evaluated further and outcomes of this evaluation can be seen in Figure 4-10. Terminal <br />Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 all identify benefits and challenges resulting from analysis against the established <br />evaluation criteria. The description and benefit/challenges summary is shown to the right of each <br />alternative concept. <br />FIGURE 4-10 <br />TERMINAL ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION MATRIX <br /> <br />Source: RS&H Analysis, 2017 <br />All terminal alternative concepts perform well in resolving current issues and meeting the needs of PAL 3, <br />providing operational/public safety, meeting FAA design standards for critical aircraft, providing <br />sustainable solutions for facility needs, and allowing for ultimate build-out of the commercial terminal. <br />Terminal Concept 3 has an advantage in operational efficiency primarily due to the new orientation of the <br />buildings to airfield facilities. Terminal Concept 3 aligns best with the vision for the ultimate land use <br />patternand both Terminal Concept 1 and Terminal Concept 3 hold an advantage in providing a high level <br />of customer service inside the terminal building. All concepts are financially feasible, each facing trade- <br />offs associated with maintaining and rehabilitating an existing terminal building or ultimately demolishing <br />and reconstructing a new terminal building. All concepts come with implementation and construction <br />phasing challenges but none are superior over others in this area of evaluation. <br />EUGENE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 4-30 <br /> <br />