Laserfiche WebLink
At the request of Mr. Pap6, Mr. Etter described the boundaries of the East and West portions of the park. He <br />also noted that Willamalane Parks and Recreation District administered all the land east of I-5. <br />C.Work Session: City Response to Lane County Waste Management Division Adoption of System <br /> Benefit Fee as Component of Disposal Fees <br /> <br />Mr. Papd recused himself from the discussion. <br /> <br />Alex Cuyler, Planning and Development Department, invited questions on the agenda item. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly indicated support for the proposed intergovernmental agreement. He asked for clarification of the <br />motion proposed by staff, which called for the assessment of a systems benefit fee against City residents. Mr. <br />Cuyler clarified that City residents would not experience an increase in disposal fees. Those residents who <br />self-haul their garbage to the Lane County transfer station in Glenwood would be assessed a systems benefit <br />as they passed through the gate. That fee, combined with the disposal fee, was no greater than the disposal fee <br />that existed today. Responding to a follow-up question from Mr. Rayor, Mr. Cuyler said that the tipping fee <br />and system benefit fee were separate fees by code, and could be adjusted administratively by the County. Mr. <br />Rayor asked if the City would have input into proposed changes. Mr. Cuyler said that the City was free to <br />offer its input to the County in the same manner as other citizens. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor asked about the purpose of the motion. Mr. Cuyler responded that the County did not have the <br />authority to implement rules inside Eugene, so the City was creating a mechanism to grant the County that <br />authority. Mr. Rayor asked if, once the authority was granted, the City would have control over the fee <br />structure. Mr. Cuyler said that the City had never had such authority in the past as the program was a County <br />program. Mr. Rayor said he did not want to give the County permission to have another fee source from the <br />City and for the City to have no control over that fee. Mr. Johnson suggested that staff discuss Mr. Rayor's <br />concerns with the County and develop text for the intergovernmental agreement to address them. <br /> <br />Mr. Cuyler noted that the County had already developed a schedule of changes to the system benefit fee. Mr. <br />Rayor wanted to see the schedule of changes. <br />Mr. Torrey suggested that text be embedded in the agreement that provided the City with an "out clause" if the <br />council was not comfortable with the agreement as implemented by the County. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, to direct staff to develop an <br /> intergovernmental agreement with Lane County that allows Lane County to regulate <br /> and collect a "system benefit fee" from licensed haulers and City of Eugene residents <br /> who dispose of materials at Lane County-operated disposal sites or at disposal sites <br /> outside of the Lane County-operated disposal system. Within a second <br /> intergovernmental agreement, allow Lane County to develop regulations related to <br /> material recovery facilities operating within the Eugene city limits. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner indicated his support for the motion. He said that he believed that solid waste recovery program <br />costs would continue to rise and that at some point the community would have realistic pricing that ensure <br />people were charged the costs of disposing of the waste they generated. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson wanted it to be clear that the motion was applicable to all Eugene residents, including Eugene <br />businesses. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 21, 1999 Page 7 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />