Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dwyer thanked the council for the opportunity to speak to the topic. He reviewed the personal/corporate <br />income tax approach, calling it a progressive tax that did not add an additional burden to property owners. <br />He discussed the concept of creating a "system balance reserve fund" to meet public safety unforeseen/unmet <br />needs that would be available to all communities. Mr. Dwyer expressed the County's willingness to work <br />with Eugene and the rural communities to ensure the success of the measure. <br /> <br />Mr. Green added that the matters of rate administration and collection had not been decided but the council <br />will be apprized of progress in that area. The logical service provider, he said, was the State but it could not <br />provide the service at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Maine said she was interested in what this council had to say and relay that to her council at its August <br />2 meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he was pleased with the proposed measure, particularly the revenue-sharing aspect, which he <br />called "the difference between success and failure" at the polls. He appreciated that there was a provision for <br />review by the PSCC but program flexibility for the individual jurisdictions. He opposed setting a sunset date <br />for the measure at this time. Mr. Kelly expressed concern about the proposal to delete the phrase "but not <br />limited to" in the document alluding to the types of programs covered. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor asked for more information on tax collection and more specifics on what the measure covers. Mr. <br />Green invited Mr. Rayor and other with concerns and questions to submit them to the PSCC for responses. <br />Mayor Torrey said the council's August 11 meeting would provide more information. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner described the proposal as fair and said he was disappointed that the State was unable to handle <br />tax collection. He agreed that the sunset was too early, preferring none at all but at minimum an 8- to 1 O-year <br />sunset. He commended the PSCC for its work. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said the question of delaying the measure to the spring has surfaced but she believed the time <br />was right to do something collectively this fall. She described the scale of the proposal as reasonable and <br />doable. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ commended PSCC Chair Mayor Maine and Former Eugene City Councilor Ken Tollenaar for their <br />work. He agreed with others that the sunset was too short. Mr. Pap~ asked what strategy would be use to sell <br />the measure. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr said he was not a supporter of new taxes, particularly at the local level, but he would support the <br />measure because of the benefits it holds for all the jurisdictions. Addressing Mr. Papa's question, Mr. Farr <br />said the measure could be successful by selling its benefits. He predicted resistance from employers. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey expressed support for the 45/55 percent split and the concept of a reserve fund, adding that he <br />believed the latter could be developed above the pooled funds. He said outcome measures were key and <br />would need to be reported and justified to the public. <br /> <br />Mr. Green encouraged communication from the council on the measure. On a related issue, Mr. Green said <br />he followed the council's July 12 discussion on public safety substations and asked what the council hoped <br />for as an outcome. He noted that a study conducted by the National Institute of Justice has shown that <br />substations do not reduce crime. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 28, 1999 Page 4 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />