Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Johnson distributed a draft concept for expenditure of PSCC revenue sharing funds. <br /> <br /> IV. WORK SESSION: ORDINANCE GRANTING TO ADVANCED <br /> TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP (ATG), A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO <br /> USE THE PUBLIC WAY TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN PUBLIC <br /> COMMUNICATION FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson introduced the topic and acknowledged the presence of Franchise Manager Pam Berrian. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly complimented staff on the agenda packet, and asked if the non-monetary terms outlined in the <br />document were comparable with similar projects. Ms. Berrian indicated that construction requirements such <br />as the engineering and construction permit fees were the same for all applicants as they were based on cost <br />recovery. Addressing a follow-up question, City Attorney Jerry Lidz indicated that the many of the <br />provisions were lifted out of a comparable franchise with U.S. West Communications. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said the item would be scheduled for a public hearing. <br /> <br />V. WORK SESSION: TRANSPLAN <br /> <br />Planning Division Manager Jan Childs introduced Tom Schwetz and Lee Shoemaker of Lane Council of <br />Governments (LCOG), Dave Reinhard from Public Works Transportation, Nick Amis from the Oregon <br />Department of Transportation (ODOT), Lisa Gardener from Lane Transit District (LTD), and Planning <br />Commissioner Art Farley. She indicated that Planning Commissioner Anne Marie Levis was en route. Ms. <br />Childs noted that the Joint Elected Officials have received a request to reschedule the public hearing on the <br />TransPlan update for later in September and polling for availability is underway. <br />Mr. Schwetz noted that the TransPlan process was nearing its 7th anniversary and the planning process was <br />largely complete. Inevitable changes to the plan, he said, would be the result of decisions made by the <br />jurisdictions prior to adopting the plan. He provided a history of the process through that period and said that <br />the plan did not detail implementation, which would be identified during the adoption process from the <br />various jurisdictions. Mr. Schwetz said that in adopting the plan the council would be adopting the goals, <br />policies, financially constrained project list, and the TransPlan as a functional plan of the Metro Plan. More <br />importantly, he added, adopting TransPlan provided an agreed-upon conceptual framework within which each <br />of the adopting bodies will pursue implementation. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Kelly, Mr. Schwetz confirmed that performance measures were based on <br />a model of full bus rapid transit build-out. Mr. Kelly expressed concern that the funding model showed only <br />the funds for the pilot corridor. <br /> <br />Planning Commission President Levis and Commissioner Farley joined the council. Ms. Levis reviewed the <br />commission's July 28, 1999, memorandum to the council and highlighted the following changes: 1) timely <br />implementation of nodal development; 2) bus rapid transit (BRT); 3) transportation demand management <br />(TDM) on a voluntary basis; 4) level of service; and 5) financially constrained project list. Ms. Levis said <br />two projects raised in discussion have been deferred to the council: the Valley River Bridge and the I- <br />5/Franklin interchange. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 28, 1999 Page 5 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />