My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5312
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2020 No. 5286-5314
>
Resolution No. 5312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2020 4:53:28 PM
Creation date
12/17/2020 4:53:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
12/14/2020
Document_Number
5312
CMO_Effective_Date
12/14/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If a position the IGR Committee has taken on a bill is not unanimous, the position on that <br />bill will be neutral until the full City Council weighs in and directs a position. The bill will <br />then be placed on the next available City Council agenda. <br />Although any bill that has been reviewed by the IGR Committee may be pulled for <br />discussion at the request of any councilor or the Mayor at the City Council meeting, as a <br />matter of practice and courtesy to the members of the Council who do not sit on the IGR <br />Committee, any bill on which the IGRCommittee is not in unanimous agreement will be <br />specifically noted. <br />The City Council can modify the position taken by the IGR Committee on a bill; the final <br />direction to staff on any bill comes from the City Council. <br />12.Process for Federal LobbyingEfforts <br />The IGR Committee and IGR staff address Federal lobbying priorities in concert with a <br />number of the City’s local governmental partners. <br />The Federal priorities begin with a review of opportunities for funding in the next Federal <br />budget and goalsthat are specific to Eugene or the area. The IGR Committee meets and <br />reviews the list of potential priority projects. Potential projects should be those projects <br />which have already gone through the proper authorization channels and are “shovel ready” <br />projects. Once the IGR Committee reviews the list of potential projects, the Committee <br />develops a list of project goals that are considered to be achievable. <br />After the proposed goals have been vetted by staff, United Front partners, and other <br />community partners, and the IGR Committee, the priorities list is then presented to the full <br />City Council for review and approval. <br /> <br />The final list becomes part of the “United Front” agenda which is presented to the area’s <br />congressional representatives, executive department staff, and other potential funding <br />sources in Washington, D.C. The attendees on the lobbying trips typically include the <br />Mayor, chair of the IGR Committee, and appropriate City staff. <br /> <br />13. Grants and Funding Applications <br />The IGR Committee acts on staff recommendations for grant and other funding applications <br />from outside agencies such as governmental or private entities. This process is intended to <br />help avoid situations in which City departments may inadvertently be competing with each <br />other for funding, and to allow the IGR Committee and City Council to review staff plans for <br />expenditures of grant funds. <br />City staff interested in seeking funding prepares a written overview of the funding <br />application for review by the IGR Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. <br />If timing is critical and there is no IGR Committee meeting scheduled, the Committee may <br />give its approval via e-mail. IGR staff will keep full and complete records of the documents <br />related to the request for funding, the electronic notification of the request to review and <br />the disposition of the request. <br />Exhibit A -- Page 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.