Laserfiche WebLink
Johnson replied that funding proposals, staffing, the steering committee, and consultant's report <br />had uniformly recommended evolution, not elimination of the event. <br /> <br /> Mr. Farr moved, seconded by Mr. Tollenaar, to direct the Eugene Celebration <br /> staff and Steering Committee to explore privatization of the event either by <br /> developing a relationship with an existing nonprofit organization with goals <br /> that support the ongoing production of the event, or by forming a new <br /> nonprofit organization; and to direct the staff and committee to return to the <br /> City Council during the month of May with a specific request for one-time <br /> transition dollars for the event. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey pointed out that one possible scenario which could evolve was that the council <br />could determine in May that the request of staff and the committee for funds could not be <br />granted. Mr. Johnson said that his best guess of the outcome of such a situation was that the <br />Celebration would not be held. Mayor Torrey said he believed it was significant for all concerned <br />to be aware of such a possibility. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said that she felt the Celebration should be self-supporting or eliminated as a City <br />event. She said she supported continuing the Celebration, even if it was not a City-sponsored <br />event. <br /> <br />Ms. Goddard stated that all issues discussed by the council had been considered by the <br />Celebration Planning Committee. She said that dwindling space resources in the downtown area <br />was a concern about the success for the event because location was its most significant success <br />factor. She said she believed that if the City sponsored the event, it should provide full financial <br />support. She also said that the shortness of time available to plan the event was complicating <br />the possibility of being successful. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr pointed out that the Eugene Celebration had grown in scope over the years and that <br />additional revenue producing efforts should be possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he believed reductions in costs through greater utilization of local talent and <br />increasing revenue by requiring pins for entry to all locations could bring income and expenses <br />for the Celebration more closely aligned. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that she believed downtown merchants should subsidize the Celebration. Ms. <br />Goddard said that the downtown merchant associations already contribute significantly to the <br />event. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said that she believed "empowerment" described as desirable by <br />members of the Eugene Celebration Planning Committee was the status of a nonprofit <br />corporation board of directors. <br /> <br />In response to a question of Mr. Meisner, Mr. Johnson said that commercial sponsorship of <br />particular venues or programs was needed more than general sponsorship of the Celebration. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said that he was struck by the implication that adopting the motion under <br />consideration would morally obligate the council to subsidize the 1998 Eugene Celebration. He <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council February 16, 1998 Page 6 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />