Laserfiche WebLink
should be ample for a nonprofit organization to produce a similar event, especially if the City <br />would continue to provide in-kind support. <br /> <br />Carole Goddard stated that she was co-chair of the 1996 Eugene Celebration. She said a <br />nonprofit organization could operate less expensively because of lower salaries, contracting of <br />services, and elimination of public contract law requirements. She said approximately $250,000 <br />in start-up funds were needed in advance of each celebration. She said she believed <br />Celebration organizers had fully explored revenue enhancement possibilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart said that, in addition to the factors identified by Ms. Goddard, non-public businesses <br />were able to operate more efficiently because of the elimination of bureaucratic functions <br />required of government programs. He said he supported investigation of turning over operation <br />of the Celebration to a nonprofit organization. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that he believed a nonprofit organization could successfully operate the <br />Celebration. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said she did not believe the City should pay for a party when it could not pay for <br />essential services. She said she needed assurance that all possible cost reduction measures <br />had been investigated. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Laue regarding why pin income had not met anticipated levels <br />in 1997, Mr. Johnson said he believed it was likely a factor of the location of pin sales booths and <br />that a great deal of the event could be accessed without a pin. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue said he was confused by revenue and expense support material provided for the <br />various options. He said it appeared that transition costs were proposed as a continuing annual <br />City expense. He said that special care should be given to crafting a Request for Proposals for <br />an organization to operate the Celebration to ensure that it retained its unique character. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she was concerned that the City could support paying of lower salaries if it <br />transferred management of the Celebration to a nonprofit organization. She determined that all <br />booth sponsors, food vendors, and parade entrants paid participation fees; but that nonprofit <br />organizations paid flat fees, rather than fees based on sales profits. She said she was also <br />concerned that privatization of the event would change its character and that she preferred that <br />the City continue as its sponsor. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar asked if it was possible for the City to loan funds to private entities. City Attorney <br />Glenn Klein said the only restriction on such loans were that proceeds from bond sales could not <br />be loaned to private entities. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said that she appreciated the enthusiasm and commitment of those <br />involved in planning the Eugene Celebration. She said she felt the City should trust that its <br />nature would not be changed through privatization. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said he could accept the importance of "doing" the Eugene Celebration differently, but <br />that he was troubled by the shortness of time available to make significant changes. Mr. <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council February 16, 1998 Page 5 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />