My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/13/98 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1998
>
CC Minutes - 04/13/98 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:08 AM
Creation date
8/16/2005 9:29:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Fart moved, seconded by Mr. Tollenaar, to approve the consent calendar. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked that the meeting minutes of February 16 be pulled so she could review the <br />meeting tapes and make a correction. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> II1. PUBLIC HEARING: URBAN RENEWAL <br /> <br />Bob Hibschman, Planning and Development Department, said that the passage of Ballot <br />Measure 50 impacted urban renewal by reducing tax revenues by 40 percent or more for the 39 <br />renewal agencies in Oregon. He said that the change was a result of fundamental revisions to <br />Oregon's property tax system. Mr. Hibschman said since urban renewal districts had entered into <br />commitments through their existing plans, the State legislature allowed for property tax revenues <br />to be sustained, or "grandfathered." The State legislation provided for three grandfathering <br />options, one of which the City must select within seven weeks. Mr. Hibschman said that there <br />were three basic choices: 1) termination; 2) collecting the base; or 3) grandfathering existing <br />revenues. <br /> <br />Mr. Hibschman said that there were six options related to the City's urban renewal districts <br />developed by the council for the public hearing: <br /> <br /> Downtown District <br /> A. Build no Projects <br /> <br /> B. Preserve Option for Library Only <br /> <br /> C. Preserve Option for Library and Downtown Projects <br /> <br /> D. Preserve Option for Downtown Projects Only <br /> <br /> Riverfront District <br /> <br /> E. Discontinue City Participation <br /> <br /> F. Reduce City Participation <br /> <br />Mr. Hibschman referred the audience to the handout distributed at the meeting, which included <br />the options above and a list of possible projects for the downtown urban renewal district. He <br />noted that the council would select an option at its work session on April 15. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br />John Lawless, 90 East 26th Avenue, said that he represented the American Institute of <br />Architect's Local Affairs Committee. His organization supported urban renewal as a tool to keep <br />Eugene growing in the right direction. He said that the visions had been formulated for <br />downtown and the riverfront. Mr. Lawless said his organization looked at the potential of <br />downtown projects and perceived several that made sense in strengthening downtown. He <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 13, 1998 Page 2 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.