My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/13/98 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1998
>
CC Minutes - 04/13/98 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:08 AM
Creation date
8/16/2005 9:29:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
encouraged the council to support urban renewal after careful examination of all its aspects, <br />including the addition of new projects such as the library and a review of administrative costs. <br /> <br />Russ Brink, 132 East Broadway, DEl, supported Option C. He discussed the results of a voters' <br />survey sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce, saying that a majority of respondents gave <br />downtown a rating of only fair when asked if downtown was in good shape. He noted that 68 <br />percent of respondents were "somewhat" or "very" dissatisfied with the current state of <br />downtown. Mr. Brink said that a majority of respondents indicated downtown was a unique <br />neighborhood that should be supported by the entire community. He said that 64 percent of <br />respondents supported urban renewal as a tool to open streets and improve downtown <br />transportation. Approximately 68 percent supported use of urban renewal to improve downtown <br />housing and renovate existing older buildings. Approximately 56 percent support using urban <br />renewal to build a new library. Mr. Brink questioned why the City Council would choose to <br />eliminate urban renewal or use it only for a downtown library. He encouraged the council to be <br />visionary about downtown projects, and consider where the funding would come from if urban <br />renewal was not in place. <br /> <br />Douglas Beauchamp, 164 West Broadway, Lane County Arts Council, asked the council to <br />continue to support the downtown urban renewal. He said that it was a catalyst for investment <br />that had made downtown Eugene a regional cultural center second only to Portland in the state. <br />He said that devoting a substantial amount of available dollars to the library was consistent with <br />past direction. Mr. Beauchamp suggested that the council include the library as part of a cultural <br />and investment fund to ensure that a portion of district funds support a broad range of <br />development and investment in infrastructure. He regretted loss of the former Downtown <br />Commission and Cultural Affairs Commission, groups he believed could have contributed to the <br />discussion. He suggested the formation of a short-term task force to determine "what this <br />means." Mr. Beauchamp supported Option C. He suggested a library, rehabilitation loans, <br />street and alley improvements, the use of the Sears building as a cultural center, and parks <br />expansion as possible projects. <br /> <br />Joyce Berman, 2440 Charnelton Street, identified herself as a library user and ABLE (A Better <br />Library for Everyone) member. She asked the council to make urban renewal funds for a library <br />that would be an improvement on the current facility and would enliven downtown. She <br />supported Option B and asked the council to take leadership and avoid referring the matter to <br />the public for a vote. Ms. Berman noted the many uses of the library, particularly for children, <br />and stressed the importance of a new library to the community. <br /> <br />Charlie Magee, 2679 University Street, supported Option B for the downtown district. Regarding <br />the riverfront district, he advocated for its preservation for recreation. Mr. McGee believed that <br />the majority of research done by scientists at the University of Oregon was conducted over the <br />telephone or via e-mail. He termed the research park "an industrial solution in an information <br />era." He supported Option E for the riverfront district. <br />Tom Hoyt, 460 Palomino Drive, introduced himself as a trustee of the University of Oregon <br />Foundation and vice chair of its Research and Technology Transfer Committee. He supported <br />Option F for the riverfront district. He said that the research park enabled the University to <br />leverage and transfer its discoveries and innovations into new technologies and start-up <br />companies. Mr. Hoyt said that professors and students at the University were making world class <br />discoveries for which patents were being issued. The Office of Technology Transfer at the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 13, 1998 Page 3 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.