Laserfiche WebLink
Elaine Phillips, 1075 West 18th Avenue, asked the elected officials to preserve and protect the <br />current wetlands plan. She did not concur with the amendments proposed by Mr. Cornacchia. <br />Ms. Phillips said that an extensive public process had occurred and much scientific study went <br />into the plan. She asked the elected officials to honor the community process and protect <br />wetlands. <br /> <br />Kathy Madison, 1401 Willamette Street, said that the community had supported the WEWP as a <br />means to balance environmental needs with sound urban development. She urged the elected <br />officials to continue to seek that balance as it considered the amendments. Ms. Madison <br />maintained that the criteria proposed by the planning commissions "took us in a new direction" <br />and removed the balance that existed in the plan. She suggested that the amendments were <br />inconsistent with Policy 1 and Policy 5 in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. <br />She supported the policy in the plan related to underground utilities. Ms. Madison endorsed the <br />suggestions made by Mr. Cornacchia in his letter to Ms. Childs dated February 6. <br /> <br />Bern Johnson, 1290 East 25th Avenue, urged the elected officials to adopt the planning <br />commissions' recommendations. He noted the Board of County Commissioners' support for the <br />plan in 1992. He said that the plan as recommended by the planning commissions was sound <br />and removed politics from the process. The plan forced the community to take an area-wide <br />view of wetlands instead of focusing on single sites. Mr. Johnson noted that the plan had <br />received national attention for its balance. He said that State and Federal agencies are placing <br />their trust in Eugene to manage the program responsibly. He asked the elected officials to honor <br />the community process and avoid last-minute changes to the amendments. Rejection of the <br />amendments would further bog down the process. <br /> <br />Misha Dunlap, 358 West 4th Avenue, agreed with Mr. Johnson's remarks. She said that it did <br />not make sense to make additional changes at this point. She said that after the amendments <br />were adopted, Mr. Cornacchia's suggestions could be considered in a similarly lengthy process. <br /> <br />Mark Wahl, PO Box 10148, represented the Eugene Water & Electric Board. He said that <br />EWEB supported the utility corridor amendments and had submitted written testimony indicating <br />that support. He said that EWEB also had several changes to recommend. Mr. Wahl said that <br />EWEB believed it was critical that the utility have access to aboveground utilities that cross <br />jurisdictional wetlands for maintenance, repair, and emergency response. Given current State <br />law and EWEB's determination to adhere to the law, the situation was not tenable for the utility <br />as it was denied access to those facilities. Mr. Wahl asked that the elected officials postpone <br />further hearings for at least six weeks to give it time to map all the utilities in the plan area and <br />provide that information to City staff. Mr. Wahl asked that the amendment process be <br />reconsidered as he believed the proposed text represented a de facto ban on new utility <br />corridors. <br /> <br />Moshe Immermann, no address given, said that wetlands sustain life. He said that there were <br />many endangered species in wetlands, including people. Wetlands must be protected to protect <br />the quality of life in the community. Mr. Immermann said that State and Federal regulatory <br />agencies have called for protection of wetlands in Eugene. Twice the planning commissions <br />have called for adoption of the draft criteria. He said that representative government was, in a <br />sense, on trial. Mr. Immermann said that Mr. Cornacchia's recommendations threatened to <br />undercut the entire process. He compared Mr. Cornacchia's's recommendations with the <br />recommendations forwarded by the commissions and asked what was the point of having a plan <br />if wetlands and wetland diversity were not to be protected. Mr. Immermann said that Mr. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials-- February 18, 1998 Page 3 <br /> Eugene City Council/Lane County Board of Commissioners <br /> <br /> <br />