Laserfiche WebLink
Cornacchia also recommended that the interconnectiveness of underground waterways and <br />aquifers be ignored, and those waterways should clearly be protected. He said that the criteria <br />were designed with the expansion of Hyundai in mind. Mr. Immermann said that the semi- <br />conductor industry has damaged underground aquifers wherever it has located. <br /> <br />Jeff Miller, 2225 Lariat Drive, said that he was opposed to the recommendations of the planning <br />commissions and supportive of the plan's original approach to preservation. He said that the <br />original plan represented a "win-win" situation for the environment and for the business <br />community. The plan allowed the community to put together a contiguous supply of quality <br />wetlands and allowed development on marginal wetlands while maintaining the urban growth <br />boundary. Mr. Miller said that the plan had been working and had been recognized nationally. <br />He said that the amendments would not work and would not benefit anyone in the community. <br />He recommended the elected officials return to the original plan intent and adopt criteria that <br />maintained the intended balance. Mr. Miller endorsed Mr. Cornacchia's recommendations as <br />"being on the right track." <br /> <br />Mr. Miller suggested that the planning commissions were biased by a lack of information and <br />given misinformation that prevented them from seeing what was best for the entire community. <br />He urged the elected officials to show leadership and support a balanced approach. <br /> <br />Mary O'Brien, 3525 Gilham Road, asked the elected officials to retain protection criteria 6, 7, <br />and 8 as independent protection criteria. She did not support Mr. Cornacchia's proposal to <br />collapse the three criteria into a single criteria. She noted that protection criteria 6 called for the <br />protection of a wetland site that contributed to the diversity of wildlife habitat in the region, even if <br />the wetland does not provide wet prairie. Ms. ©'Brien said that the wetland south of the Hyundai <br />factory provided the only prairie habitat corridor between oak savannah habitat and the Willow <br />Creek natural area. Protection criteria 7 called for protection of a wetland site that played an <br />important role in the functioning of the larger wetland system because it combined several <br />characteristics. The wetlands south of the Hyundai factory combined size, location, hydrological, <br />and biological corridor connections with other wetlands and presence of rare plants and animals. <br />Ms. ©'Brien said that protection criteria 8 called for protection of wetland sites that included the <br />last remaining 0.03 percent prairie habitat in Oregon. She observed that the wetlands south of <br />the Hyundai factory contained four acres of that habitat. <br /> <br />Ms. ©'Brien said that the rationale behind Mr. Cornacchia's proposal to collapse the three criteria <br />into one could be discovered by looking at the other changes he proposed. Mr. Cornacchia <br />proposed eliminating the protection criteria that protected any wetland site with a hydrological <br />connection to another wetland in spite of the fact that the formerly natural hydrological <br />connection had been directed through pipes. If the criterion was adopted, Ms. ©'Brien said, the <br />wetlands south of the Hyundai factor would fail to meet the protection criteria. Mr. Cornacchia <br />suggested a new development criterion to allow expansion of existing business onto a wetland <br />site so Hyundai can expand to the wetlands south of its present factory. Ms. ©'Brien said that <br />additionally, Mr. Cornacchia proposed expanding another development criterion by suggesting <br />that the campus industrial designation were as unique to economic development as wet prairie <br />was to wetlands. <br />Ms. ©'Brien said that Mr. Cornacchia's proposals had nothing to do with seeking a balance, <br />nothing to do with retaining the ability of a planner to distinguish between different wetlands sites, <br />nothing to do with meeting the WEWP goals, and nothing to do with two years of community and <br />staff planning. The proposal appeared instead to crudely twist the WEWP amendments process <br />to bend to the wishes of Hyundai to expand onto ecologically important wetlands. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials-- February 18, 1998 Page 4 <br /> Eugene City Council/Lane County Board of Commissioners <br /> <br /> <br />