Laserfiche WebLink
representatives of the university regarding the assessments. He reported staff recommendations <br />for the assessments. He reviewed alternative options which could be considered by the council. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar asked why the appraisal of the streets for which vacation was sought used the <br />value of property zoned Multiple Family Residential (R-4) for comparison and not that of property <br />zoned Public Land (PL) which abutted the streets. Mr. Kullby replied that doing so was common <br />appraisal practice since no assessed value was established for property zoned PL. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Chris Ramey, 1755 Fairmount, stated that he was the University of Oregon architect and <br />Director of Facilities Planning. He thanked staff for its work on the vacation applications. He said <br />the university agreed with the recommendation that the vacations were appropriate. <br /> <br />Mr. Ramey discussed the staff recommendation for assessment of the streets proposed to be <br />vacated. He stated that the mission of the university was to provide benefit to the State. He <br />reviewed benefits provided to citizens of Eugene--use of libraries, summer camp programs, early <br />childhood intervention and assessment programs, and cooperative transfer of properties. He <br />urged councilors to consider the unique nature of the vacations and recommend that a nominal <br />amount be assessed for their value. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined there was no one else present who wished to testify and closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee stated that he believed the vacation applications were an opportunity for the City and <br />University of Oregon to work cooperatively on a major project. He said he supported Option 4 of <br />the staff report, the establishment of nominal assessments for the value of the streets. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that he concurred with Mr. Lee on Option 4 and encouraged the council to <br />approve the vacations and support establishment of nominal assessments because of the <br />support provided by the university for accomplishing the council goal of increasing the availability <br />of affordable housing. He said he did not believe the streets proposed for vacation were of use <br />to the City and that the appraisals on which assessment recommendations were based <br />represented a fair market value. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said she did not believe it was possible to calculate a reasonable value <br />for the streets proposed for vacation. She said she favored Option 4 for establishing nominal <br />assessments for the property; but if higher assessments were approved, she believed financing <br />should be arranged. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov asked who would be responsible for maintenance of the streets when <br />they were vacated, if the value of construction and improvement of the street could be <br />considered as a basis for assessments, and how funds for assessments were received by the <br />City. <br /> <br />Mr. Kullby replied that responsibility for normal maintenance of the streets would belong to the <br />university, but that Eugene Water & Electric Board would be responsible for maintenance of <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council April 6, 1998 Page 7 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />