Laserfiche WebLink
Fyijcju!D! <br />Laurel Hill Valley <br />6. The Laurel Hill Plan supports the South Hills Study standards. In general, alteration of <br />land contours shall be minimized to retain views of natural features and retain as much <br />of the forested atmosphere as possible. Aside from purely aesthetic considerations, these <br />hillsides demand care in development because the topsoil is thin and the water runoff is <br />rapid. Proposed developments shall respect the above considerations. The Valley hillside <br />policy applies to all land with an average slope, from toe to crest, of 15 percent or <br />greater. (A 15-percent slope is one in which the land rises 15 feet per 100 horizontal <br />feet.) <br />b/!If, in the opinion of the responsible City official, an adverse conservation or <br />geological condition exists upon a parcel of land proposed for subdivision, or <br />before any major hillside clearing, excavation, fill or construction is <br />contemplated, the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, <br />Excavation and Grading, and those sections of the code relative to foundation <br />design may be invoked. ! <br />c/!Considerable latitude shall be allowed the developer in shaping, depth, and <br />required street frontages of lots where it is necessary to preserve terrain. ! <br /> <br />The above policy can be summarized as providing direction to preserve the aesthetics of <br />hillsides, and functions of soil on hillsides. The proposed amendments update tree preservation <br />standards to provide more specific standards, and also add more stringent tree preservation <br />requirements for properties located at a higher elevation. The amendments also update the <br />requirements for geological and geotechnical analysis, adding additional standards with the <br />intent of identifying any existing or potential stability issues on a given site. Both updates are <br />supportive of the above policy because they add more robust standards that can be applied to <br />applications filed under clear and objective criteria. ! <br /> <br />River Road-Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (1987) <br />The following policies from the River Road-Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan appear to be <br />applicable to the proposed code amendments: <br /> <br />1.0!Recognize and maintain the predominately low-density residential character of the <br />area consistent with the Metropolitan Plan. <br />2.0 Provide diversity of housing types in the area. Available techniques include <br />encouraging reinvestment and rehabilitation of existing housing stock and the use <br />of development standards that provide for cluster or planned unit development. <br /> <br />One of the main goals of the proposed amendments is to remove barriers to housing by <br />The proposed amendments are <br />intended to provide clarity and promote efficiency in development, which can open up the <br />possibility for providing denser housing and/or a wider variety of housing types. More available <br />housing stock should increase the opportunity for home ownership within the plan area. To the <br />extent that the amendments will increase development, the proposed transition standards <br />reduce impacts of higher intensity development when located near property zoned for lower <br />intensity development. <br />Qbhf!24!pg!32! <br /> <br />