My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord. 20647
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2021 No. 20645 - 20664
>
Ord. 20647
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2021 2:43:55 PM
Creation date
6/7/2021 2:43:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
4/14/2021
Document_Number
20647
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fyijcju!D! <br />South Hills Study. For additional discussion of tree preservation standards, see the findings <br />provided under Statewide Planning Goal 10. <br /> <br />EC 9.8325 Tentative Planned Unit Development Approval Criteria <br />The approval criteria at EC 9.8325(12) (now EC 9.8325(10)) sets specific requirements for <br />development within the South Hills Study area. The proposed updates to those criteria allow <br />additional development of homes at an elevation over 900 feet, while maintaining consistency <br />with the policy direction t <br />an intensive level of development. This will be achieved by limiting density to 2.5 units per <br />gross acre (which is consistent with assumptions made in the 2017 Envision Eugene Residential <br />Land Supply Study based on historical levels of development achieved on property above 900 <br />feet elevation within the South Hills Study area) and limiting the development footprint in this <br />area. The addition of more stringent standards for tree preservation and geotechnical analysis <br />both align with the intent of the South Hills Study in a way that is more impactful than simply <br />placing a numerical limit on development. <br /> <br />The amendments also remove EC 9.8325(12)(c) which required clustering of developments. This <br />criterion attempted to address, in a clear and objective manner, the South Hills Study policy to <br />encourage clustering of development in areas characterized by: shallowest slopes; lowest <br />elevations; least amount of vegetation; and least amount of visual impact and to encourage <br />preservation as open space those areas characterized by: intermediate and steep slopes; higher <br />elevations; significant amounts of vegetation; significant visual impact. Much of the policy <br />language is inherently subjective and difficult to translate directly into clear and objective <br />standards. To the extent that the clustering accomplished the intent of the South Hills Study <br />policies, the result was leaving large portions (at least 40%) of a site as undeveloped common <br />open space. This heavy-handed preservation requirement was identified as one of the main <br />disincentives for applicants to use the existing clear and objective track for PUDs. As noted <br />above, the standards for geological analysis and tree preservation are becoming more <br />stringent, in part to better address some of the policy goals and direction in a more holistic <br />way. While the specific approval criterion that requires clustering of development is being <br />removed, the impact of better tree preservation/mitigation standards and development design <br />that takes geological issues into consideration continue to encourage clustering of development <br />in areas with shallowest slopes, lowest elevations, least amount of vegetation, and least <br />amount of visual impact; and encourage preservation of open space in areas characterized by <br />intermediate and steep slopes, higher elevations, significant amounts of vegetation, and <br />significant visual impact. <br /> <br />Based on the above findings and consideration of the amendments as a package, the <br />amendments are consistent with the South Hills Study. <br /> <br />Walnut Station Specific Area Plan <br />The following policy from the Walnut Station Specific Area Plan appears applicable to the <br />proposed code amendments: <br /> <br />(c) Impacts to any adjacent residentially zoned properties are minimized. Design <br />Qbhf!27!pg!32! <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.