Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C <br />. Planning Dir~ctor's Recomm~ndatio~ and Findings . <br />Eugene School District 4J (File'A 08-1) . <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />, i <br />I <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />682-5488 <br /> <br /> <br />EVALULATION: '. . " <br />. Based .on the information provided by the applicant, th~ City has detennined that this req'uest complies with Eugen~ <br />Code (BC) Section 9.7805 Annexation;. Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and approval in accordance with <br />the requir~rrients, application criteria and procedures ofEC 9.7800 through 9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are <br />presented below in bold typeface with findings and conclusions following each. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />~C ~.7825(1) 'f:be blnd pr~po~e4'!o.~~*Dne~~di~:~itlj]J;l:~he~city~s-:~r~a.~ gfq~hJ~4;n~'ndarY ~n~' is: <br />. '., ".(a)Colitiguousto.thecitylimits;or. ,..,:::-..,....;. ...".~..>:....... .' ..: ......:. .' '. <br />. . " " .' .. " . . .. l ...." '. . . ..' '. <br /> <br />. . ....,:'.. ~(~) S.ePt~~~~~'~~~~"~~.~.~~~:~.~.~r.~~..~~~~~jf.~~~t ~fi~~t:.~~.,~~~r~~~::~~~~J~~~~~.o~1ter.::'b~~y.:~~.'. .'.;:' <br /> <br />. . wa er. '. . . ' " '.' '. . ,', .' " . . . . .. '". .'. " '. .." . '. <br /> <br />Com lies '. Findings:' The annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary,(UGB), and is <br />[8jYES 0 NO contiguous to the City limits, consistent with subseption (a). As shown on the applicant's map, the <br />City limits are contiguous with the subject area ofJand along' the eastern, southe~stern ahd~est~m <br />boundaries of the property. Additionally, the portion of the subject property that prov.ides access <br />to the site from' Cobur Road is alread annexed. <br />Et; 9.7825(2) The propose4 annexation is ~oDsjstentw.tb.applic~~le:po1icies in.the.Metr4):P~n and 'in any <br />a licable refinement lans. . '.' . .' '. . <br />lies Findings: The proposed annexation area is within the urban growth boundary. Several policies <br />NO from the Metro Plan generally support thi$ annexation by encouraging compact urban growth to <br />achhwe efficient use of land and urban service provisions within the UGB, including the <br />follo'Ying; . : ".. <br /> <br />c. Growth Management; Goals,.Findin~ and Policies: <br />,Policy B.,Land with the UGB may be converte.dfrom '7Il'banizable to urban only through <br />annexation.to a city when it #found that: <br />a. A !'2inimum level of key urbanfacilities and services can be provided ~o the area in an <br />o~derly and effiql.ent manner. .. .' . <br />b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities. <br />. Conversion'ofurbanizable land,tD urban shall also be consistent with the Metro Plan. <br />(page. II-C-4) <br /> <br />Policy J O. Annexation to a city through -normal processes shall continue to be the highest. <br />priority. (page.II-C-4). <br /> <br />Policy J 6. Ultimaiely. land within the 'UGB shall be annexed to C! city and prOVided with the <br />required minimum level of urban facilities and servic~. .While ,he til'!'e frame for annexation <br />mo)1'va1')i, annexation should occur as land traitsitions from urbanizable to urban: (page I/-C- <br /> <br />5) . .'. '.' . . . ' ,. . , ~'" . <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Additionally, both the Metro Plan ~nd the applicable refinement pJan, the WilIakenzie Ar~a Plan, <br />designate the annexation area as appropri.ate for ~ow Density Residential iJs.e. The Metro Plan also <br />desi . ates the ro e as a Nodal Develo ment Area. In accordance witb EC 9.7820(3 the INn <br /> <br />.Eugene"School District 4J (A 08':')) August 2008, Ptl~e 1 <br /> <br />City .COuncil Agenda page'117 <br /> <br />, , <br />i <br />