My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Ordinance on MUPTE
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 10/22/08 Work Session
>
Item B: Ordinance on MUPTE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:52 PM
Creation date
10/17/2008 10:31:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/22/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT G <br /> <br />ISSUES RAISED BY CITY COUNCILORS IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER <br />2007 <br /> <br />Because new multi-family housing is not occurring in west Eugene and low-income <br />housing is limited by the Housing Dispersal Policy, could the boundary extend to the <br />Four Corners and Trainsong area? <br /> <br />Response: The MUPTE boundary can be extended and a map showing this option is <br />included as Attachment C-3. The Housing Dispersal Policy discourages City subsidy <br />thth <br />assistance for family housing in low-income neighborhoods. The 6, 7, and Trainsong <br /> <br />areas are specifically impacted by the policy. <br /> <br />Is the MUPTE tool needed in West University area and how much of a role should <br />the City take on to encourage quality development? Are there quality standards <br />that could be changed or added to the list? <br /> <br />Response: West University is coming out of a long period with little rehabilitation or <br />new construction activity. How long the period lasts depends entirely on economic <br />factors. Appraisers acknowledge that some multi-family construction is currently <br />economically possible without MUPTE, depending on the price paid for the land and the <br />quality of the construction. This is evidenced by two recent developments that did not <br />request MUPTE. In each case the land was acquired at a price well below the current <br />market value. Appraisers also note that the overall quality of the West University <br />neighborhood has suffered from the previous uses of inexpensive construction and the <br />same experience may be repeated if left only to market forces. Attachment D is a <br />proposal for new selection criteria with objective standards that include incentives for <br />higher quality. <br /> <br />Was the original intent of the program to promote compact urban growth and <br />infill? <br /> <br />Response: The state created the program through statutes and Eugene adopted the <br />provisions as an incentive to promote higher density in the core area. The state <br />legislation was broadened later to include areas along mass transit lines. It was created <br />as a tool to encourage compact urban growth and growth in mass-transit corridors, in <br />recognition that in-fill is typically more costly than “green field” development. <br /> <br />What is the definition of “low-income housing?” <br /> <br />Response: “Low-income” is a term that is often informally used with different meanings. <br />HUD publishes income information for the area annually. The HUD definitions are used <br />in a variety of adopted City documents: <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.