Laserfiche WebLink
B. WORK SESSION: CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUE—HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT <br />IN THE CENTER CORE <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced the item, recalling that in 2004 the council had adopted as its only goal that <br />nd <br />the siting of a hospital in the center core, an area defined as a 2-1/2 mile area around 2 Avenue and <br />Chambers Street on the south side of the river. That goal was carried forward in 2005. Staff had prepared <br />an action plan for the goal (Attachment B in the meeting packet) that outlined a three-phase process—Site <br />Selection, Planning and Design, and Construction—to accomplish the goal. He anticipated a three- to five- <br />year process before a new hospital could be built. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor reminded the council that the City reached the outline of an agreement with the <br />McKenzie-Willamette Health Center and with staff from the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) in <br />Fall 2004. He recalled that one of the issues the council discussed at its December 2004 work session on the <br />subject was the hospital’s stipulation that its location on the EWEB site depended on the construction of an <br />underpass in the Patterson Street area. Staff had developed a financing and construction plan for that <br />facility, anticipating the costs would be repaid by the tax increment generated by an $85 million hospital <br />located in the urban renewal district. The council also discussed purchasing the riparian edge of the EWEB <br />property to ensure it could control what occurred in that area with regard to pedestrian and bicycling <br />connections. Funding was included in the fiscal year 2006 budget to support the staff work. <br /> <br />At this point, City Manager Taylor said, all the elements under the City’s control were in place. The <br />outstanding issue that remained was site selection and land assembly, which precluded the City from <br />executing an agreement that allowed it to begin to design the underpass. The City lacked only a firm <br />commitment or timeline from the hospital for the purchase of the EWEB site. Speaking to that issue, City <br />Manager Taylor said that at the last EWEB meeting, EWEB staff recommended the commissioners pursue <br />the move of some or all of its operations to a new site in a phased manner. The commissioners declined to <br />adopt the staff recommendation, and instead directed staff to continue work on the engineering and <br />architectural design necessary for a move that occurred either in phases or all at once. He anticipated that <br />work would not be done until mid-November. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor acknowledged hope that the site transaction would have already occurred, clarifying <br />the location of the hospital in time to influence the certificate of need process through which the hospital had <br />to go, allowing EWEB to put forward a refinancing proposal this year. However, that would not be the <br />case. The City’s plans remained in effect. Staff was prepared to move forward when necessary. He added <br />that the work the City had done with regard to planning for the underpass had application not only for this <br />project, but for other projects in the urban renewal district. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor acknowledged the work of Acting Planning and Development Director Susan Muir, <br />Assistant City Manager Jim Carlson, Public Works Director Kurt Corey, Keli Osborn of the Planning and <br />Development Department, and Sue Cutsogeorge of the Central Services Department, who were all present to <br />answer questions if needed. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called on the council for questions and comments. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz determined from the manager that if the hospital did not succeed in securing the EWEB site, the <br />council action plan would not go forward. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council August 8, 2005 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />