Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Civilian Review Board <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Norton Cabell, Chair 777 Pearl, Room 105 <br />Kate Wilkinson, Vice Chair Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />Munir Katul (541) 682-5005 <br />Anne-Marie Lemire (541) 682-5414 FAX <br />Richard Brissendon www.eugene-or.gov <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Civilian Review Board Report To City Council <br /> <br /> January – September 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The goal of the CRB, under Eugene City ordinance, is to “increase the transparency of, and <br />public confidence in, the police complaint process.”We do that by (1) evaluating the work of the Auditor, <br /> <br />(2) reviewing selected completed complaint investigations,(3) reviewing trends and statistics regarding <br /> <br />complaints,and (4) providing a forum for the expression of community concerns about specific incidents. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Evaluating the Police Auditor: <br /> <br />We began discussions this past spring, assisted by Alana Holmes of the City’s Human Resources <br />Department, regarding a process for reviewing the work of the Auditor. However, that came to a halt once <br />former auditor Cris Beamud announced her resignation. We, both the CRB and the community, were <br />fortunate that we already had Dawn Reynolds on board as Deputy Auditor. The Council has since <br />appointed her as the Interim Police Auditor. While the Board members certainly miss Cris, the transition <br />has been quite seamless. Dawn and Cris had worked well together so there have not been any gaps in <br />service to the public or support for the board, and we have witnessed welcomed innovations to the <br />process. <br /> <br />Reviewing Investigations of Complaints: <br /> <br />The Board began reviewing actual complaints in January 2008. Through September 2008 we <br />have reviewed 10 cases. At the end of each month the Auditor provides a summary of cases that have <br />closed and makes her own recommendation as to which case(s) she believes would have the greatest <br />value to the oversight system. Although we have had occasion to review two cases in a single meeting, <br />the norm is to review a single case. <br /> <br /> The reviews follow lengthy preparation on the part of the Auditor and her staff <br />and our board members. Before each meeting we review a complete case file. Typically this <br />consists of an AIC Report prepared by the IA investigator, underlying police reports, occasional <br />medical reports, and taped interviews of the complainant, witnesses, involved officers and, where <br />available, in-car videos. Preparation time for CRB members before a meeting probably takes an <br />average of eight hours. We decided not to draft a formal process for determining what cases to <br />review until we had more experience, though we have paid particular attention to requests from <br />complainants and to recommendations from the Auditor. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />