Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman asked if the council could condition its decision on future council approval of the proposed design <br />to ensure they were not approving ramps, and that decision would have to be brought back to council. City Attorney <br />Jerome did not think so. She believed this was the council’s sole decision point. Councilor Bettman averred that the <br />council’s approval would mean tacit approval of the ramps desired by Mayor Leiken. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Donnell said that if the addition of new ramps required Metro Plan changes, the council would then have an <br />opportunity to weigh in on that decision. Councilor Bettman suggested that ODOT could argue that the council <br />already approved those ramps by adopting the resolution. City Attorney Jerome said no. The resolution did not <br />anticipate a particular design outside the greenway area exception to accommodate the bridge. Design is more <br />appropriately discussed under the next agenda item. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said that when he asked ODOT staff at the MPC meeting if the design accommodated ramps at <br />Franklin, staff indicated it did not and also that the costs for such ramps were not included. He was concerned by <br />Councilor Bettman’s remarks, however, and wanted to modify the ordinance to state that reconstruction of roadway <br />approaches to the bridges involved only the existing ramps. City Attorney Jerome pointed out that the three entities <br />with jurisdiction over the matter—Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County—needed to agree on the text in the <br />ordinance. Springfield had already passed the same ordinance as the ordinance before the council; Lane County had <br />yet to take action. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka did not support on-ramps at Franklin Boulevard because of the impact it would have on the <br />neighborhood he represented. He maintained that Mayor Leiken’s suggestion was a “dumb way to do it” because <br />fixing the Glenwood intersection accomplished “almost the exact same thing” at half the price. He indicated his intent <br />to offer an amendment that would require Springfield to change the text it adopted. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to amend the motion to add “existing” <br />before the word “ramps” to the line on page 13. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman believed that the findings as well as the ordinance would need to be changed anywhere which <br />referred to ramps. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Donnell indicated she believed there needed to be clarification on the different ramps being discussed to avoid <br />confusion. It was stated as a clarification, any on- or off-ramps to Franklin are within the greenway therefore changes <br />to those would trigger a greenway permit and would thus trigger a Metro Plan amendment which would go before <br />council. So this would come before the council as a project in the future. <br /> <br />Although he sympathized with Councilor Zelenka’s desire to protect a neighborhood in his ward, Councilor Clark <br />could not support the amendment because he did not want to contribute yet another story about how the council <br />would not cooperate and coordinate with Springfield, which was a major concern for City residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy understood what councilors Zelenka and Bettman were trying to achieve, but questioned whether there <br />was another way to address the issue that did not require Springfield to readopt the ordinance. City Attorney Jerome <br />volunteered to return with a legal memorandum on the topic. She did not think approving the Metro Plan amendment <br />authorized future additional ramps. She did not think ramps could be constructed without being placed in the <br />greenway, which would require council action or a Metro Plan amendment. Mayor Piercy asked if the item was time- <br />sensitive. City Attorney Jerome said that the council could not hear the next item pending resolution of the item <br />before the council because of the ex parte issue. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Donnell indicated that ODOT would like to move forward as soon as possible given its concerns about the <br />time limits for doing the necessary in-water work . ODOT hoped to have action by the council break. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 16, 2008 Page 10 <br /> Meeting <br /> <br />