Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Ortiz understood the concerns expressed by Councilors Zelenka and Bettman but was also worried about <br />the message being sent to Springfield. She believed the council would have an opportunity to act at a later time in <br />regard to the ramps and wanted to move ahead at this time. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she would be happy to defer action until the council had more specific legal advice that <br />council approval would not be “de facto” approval of future on-ramps. She believed a delay would give the City <br />Manager time to communicate with Springfield and “smooth the way” without precipitous action. Councilor <br />Bettman said if the amendment failed she would move to table the item for action prior to the council recess. She <br />said that everyone was in a hurry, but such projects took “years and decades.” <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Taylor, Zelenka, and Bettman <br />voting yes. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor supported the motion on the table. He did not think anyone could “sneak ramps in” because they <br />would require an additional approval process. In addition, the last time he talked with ODOT staff, it had indicated <br />such ramps were not in ODOT’s plans and that, if requested, Eugene and Springfield would have to pay for them. <br />He did not believe the local community had the money to pay for such ramps. He suggested that the proposal to add <br />ramps had little probability of occurring. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the motion to delay the vote to <br />give the City Manager time to talk to the Springfield City Manager about the concern’s regarding the <br />new ramps. Roll call vote; the amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Taylor, Bettman, and <br />Zelenka voting yes. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the main motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved that the council adopt Council Bill 4982, <br />an ordinance amending the Willakenzie Area Plan Text in the Willamette Greenway Section. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated she had seconded the motion in her role as council vice president but would vote against <br />it. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:1:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no, and Councilor <br />Solomon being out of the room when the vote was taken. <br /> <br />7. DISCUSSION: <br />I-5 Willamette River Bridge—Bridge Design Type Selection <br /> <br />Tim Dodson of ODOT provided an overview of the bridge design selection process. He first noted the public <br />involvement process, reviewed the integrated project timeline, and shared information about the bridge types under <br />consideration. Mr. Dodson discussed the evaluation process for the bridge design, noting a Citizen Advisory Group <br />decision was anticipated in early August. He noted the final authority for the design rested with the Major Projects <br />Branch of ODOT. He reviewed the input that would be considered in the selection process by the Project Design <br />Team; that team’s recommendation would be endorsed by the manager of the Major Projects Branch. <br /> <br />Mr. Dodson invited questions about the process. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy appreciated the thorough community outreach effort done by ODOT and its attention to environmental <br />concerns. She liked the through-arch design. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 16, 2008 Page 11 <br /> Meeting <br /> <br />