Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. O’Donnell indicated that ODOT would like to move forward as soon as possible given its concerns <br />about the time limits for doing the necessary in-water work . ODOT hoped to have action by the council <br />break. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz understood the concerns expressed by Councilors Zelenka and Bettman but was also <br />worried about the message being sent to Springfield. She believed the council would have an opportunity to <br />act at a later time in regard to the ramps and wanted to move ahead at this time. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she would be happy to defer action until the council had more specific legal advice <br />that council approval would not be “de facto” approval of future on-ramps. She believed a delay would give <br />the City Manager time to communicate with Springfield and “smooth the way” without precipitous action. <br />Councilor Bettman said if the amendment failed she would move to table the item for action prior to the <br />council recess. She said that everyone was in a hurry, but such projects took “years and decades.” <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Taylor, Zelenka, and <br />Bettman voting yes. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor supported the motion on the table. He did not think anyone could “sneak ramps in” because <br />they would require an additional approval process. In addition, the last time he talked with ODOT staff, it <br />had indicated such ramps were not in ODOT’s plans and that, if requested, Eugene and Springfield would <br />have to pay for them. He did not believe the local community had the money to pay for such ramps. He <br />suggested that the proposal to add ramps had little probability of occurring. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the motion to delay the <br />vote to give the City Manager time to talk to the Springfield City Manager about the con- <br />cern’s regarding the new ramps. Roll call vote; the amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; <br />councilors Taylor, Bettman, and Zelenka voting yes. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the main motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved that the council adopt Council <br />Bill 4982, an ordinance amending the Willakenzie Area Plan Text in the Willamette Green- <br />way Section. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated she had seconded the motion in her role as council vice president but would <br />vote against it. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:1:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no, and <br />Councilor Solomon being out of the room when the vote was taken. <br /> <br />7. DISCUSSION: <br />I-5 Willamette River Bridge—Bridge Design Type Selection <br /> <br />Tim Dodson of ODOT provided an overview of the bridge design selection process. He first noted the <br />public involvement process, reviewed the integrated project timeline, and shared information about the <br />bridge types under consideration. Mr. Dodson discussed the evaluation process for the bridge design, noting <br />a Citizen Advisory Group decision was anticipated in early August. He noted the final authority for the <br />design rested with the Major Projects Branch of ODOT. He reviewed the input that would be considered in <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 28, 2008 Page 12 <br /> Meeting <br />