Laserfiche WebLink
the selection process by the Project Design Team; that team’s recommendation would be endorsed by the <br />manager of the Major Projects Branch. <br /> <br />Mr. Dodson invited questions about the process. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy appreciated the thorough community outreach effort done by ODOT and its attention to <br />environmental concerns. She liked the through-arch design. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon said she took the Web survey and thought it was fun. She asked which design emerged <br />as the public favorite. Ms. Dodson said 55 percent of first place votes went to the through-arch bridge, <br />which also had 25 percent of the last place votes. The deck arch bridge had 35 percent of first place votes <br />and 70 percent of the combined first and second place votes, and only three percent of the last place votes. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling expressed support for the through-arch as a first preference to the deck-arch, his second <br />preference, and asked about the difference in costs between the options. Mr. Dodd said that staff was still <br />discussing the costs of the options and he hoped to have that information available by August 5, 2008. He <br />added that one of the most affordable bridges appeared to be the deck-arch bridge and the most expensive <br />the through-rch bridge. He reiterated that those estimates were premature. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked which bridge had the least impact on the river and riverbank. Mr. Dodson said that <br />they all had the same pier locations and number of piers and were the same in that regard as to impact. The <br />deck options had an additional pier south of Franklin Boulevard between the road and the river. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka also liked the through-arch with the deck-arch a second choice. He raised the issue of <br />storm water, which was of importance to his constituents. He said the issue of drainage was important to <br />them, and he hoped ODOT addressed it. Mr. Dodson said that ODOT had storm water specialists and he <br />would pass that information on to them. He asked Councilor Zelenka if he could share any specifics about <br />what problems he hoped to solve. Councilor Zelenka had nothing specific to offer Mr. Dodson but thought <br />there was a problem that ODOT should address. Mr. Dodson said he would appreciate more specific <br />guidance about any problems that existed. Councilor Zelenka believed the project development team was <br />working on the issue. Mr. Dodson said the engineering details in regard to drainage were being worked out <br />by ODOT’s consultant. Councilor Zelenka promised to get back to Mr. Dodson with specifics. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if the half-arch could be a whole-arch so it did not look so off-center and <br />asymmetrical, and asked if ODOT had considered replacing the two large arches with one larger arch, and <br />placing the piers farther apart. Mr. Dodson said that the only way to accomplish a single span would be <br />through a suspension bridge. He added that the higher the span, the higher the cost per square foot. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman also liked the through-arch because of the element of Franklin Boulevard and hoped <br />something could be done to beautify the view from Franklin Boulevard as well as from the river. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked how the design elements accommodated future new ramps. Mr. Dodson said <br />ODOT did not contemplate accommodating new ramps, but accommodating any type of interchange design <br />for the Glenwood-Franklin with a hole under Franklin Boulevard wide and high enough to accommodate up <br />to seven extra lanes of traffic. However, it was very unlikely that one would ever have seven lanes. He <br />noted that the AIA study of the Franklin Boulevard corridor did not contemplate seven lanes. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 28, 2008 Page 13 <br /> Meeting <br />