Ordinance No. 19839 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3 . The on 1 y alternative to the alteration wou 1 d be demo - lition of the historic property. ~c} Distinctive stylistic features and examples of ski 11 ed craftsmanship have been retained to the greatest extent passible. ~d} The alteration is compatible in design, site, arrange- ment, proportion, detai 1, scale, color, texture, material and char- acter with the rest of the historic property and the nearby area. fie} .The alteration wi 11 not create an earlier h i stori c appearance which is different than the remainder of the property or which has no historic basis . ~ 2} Criteria far new construction or ma 'or new 1 andsca i n . New construction and/or major new 1 andscapi ng projects shat 1 be governed by the following ,criteria instead of the standards set forth i n subsection ~ ~ } of this section: ~a} Consistency with the reasons for the historic 1 andmark designation as set forth in the designation decision; in the case of an undesignated historic property as described in section 9.218, consistency with the purpose of sections 9.200 to 9.218 of this code. fib} The effect of the proposed new structure on the character of the historic property. ~c} The general compati bi 1 i ty of the exterior design, type, arrangement, proportion, size, detail, scale, color, texture, and materials of the proposed new building, structure, object or 1 and- scapi ng with the character of the historic property. ~d} Development standards adopted by the board at the time of landmark designation. ~3} Criteria for alteration to noncom atible ra ert within dis- tricts and ensembles. Alteration to historically noncompatible property within the boundaries of a h i stori c district or ensemble, shat 1 be governed by the following criteria instead of the standards set forth i n subsections ~1} or ~2} of this section: ~a} Design guidelines adopted by the board at the time of designation of the district or ensemble. fib} The alterations do not detract from the historic charac- acter of the district or ensemble through their design, arrange- ment, proport i an, size, scale, detail , color, texture, and material . ~4} Conditions. Reasonable conditions may be imposed i n granting an alteration, new construction, or major new landscaping application . Par- ticular conditions may be imposed based on the following considerations: ~a} Deteriorated architectural features should be repaired rather than replaced whenever possible. Deteriorated architectural features that cannot be repaired should be replaced with material which matches the original material in design, color, texture and other visual qualities. Whenever possible, repair or replacement of architectural features shvul d be based on accurate duplications of features and composition of materials, substantiated by hi s- toric, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the avai 1 obi 1 i ty of architectural e1 ements from other bui 1 di ngs or structures. ~ b} When surf ace c~ can i ng of bui 1 di ngs or structures takes place, it should be undertaken with the gentlest effective means pass i b1 e . Sandblasting and other abrasive cl can i ng methods that Ordinance - 13