Ordinance No. 19855 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

H. The Eugene City Council held a wark session on the draft Willakenzie Area Plan on April 13, 1992 and held a public hearing on the December lo, 1992 version of the draft Plan on April 29, 1992. I. The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the draft Willakenzie Area P1 an as revised by the Eugene Planning Commission. Based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the public testimony before the Commission and this Council, and the findings set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, the City Council has determined that the Willakenzie Area Plan is consistent with the Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, as acknowledged by LCDC, and consequently the Plan conforms to applicable statewide planning goals. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based on the above findings, which are adopted herein, and subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth in Sections 4 and 5, the Willakenzie Area Plan attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference, including the policies set forth therein, and the revisions as described in the attached Exhibit Bare hereby adopted as a refinement of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General P1 an for the Eugene portion of the Urban Growth Boundary. Section 2. The City Council adopts as additional findings, the support- ing text, maps, graphs, and tables contained in the Willakenzie Area P1 an, and the Willakenzie Area Plan Appendix. Section 3. The Plan Diagram included in the Willakenzie Area Plan, as revised in Exhibit B, is hereby adopted as a refinement of the Eugene-Spring- field Metropolitan Area General Plan. The explanatory text discussing the Plan Diagram designations within each subarea is Intended to clarify and provide further explanation of the intent of the Metro Plan Diagram. Section 4. The proposed actions set forth in the Plan are recognized as potential ideas on how to address the policies, but are not adopted as City policy. Section 5. The list of Planning Commission Implementation Priorities set forth in the memorandum entitled "Planning Commission Recommendations on Implementation Priorities", attached as Exhibit D hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is recognized as providing direction for implementation activities, though it is recognized that project complexity and budget con- straints may affect the City's ability to implement specific projects. Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a sepa- rate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding sha11 not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Section 7. Resolution Na. 3555, adapting the Coburg-Crescent Special Area Study, adopted by the Council on July 27, 1981 is hereby repealed. _~..