Laserfiche WebLink
ORDINANCE N0. 1~1,g <br />AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE METROPOLITAN INDUSTRIAL LANDS <br />SPECIAL STUDY INVENTORY AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS REPORTS, <br />ADOPTING GOVERNMENT-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE METROPOLITAN <br />AREA GENERAL PLAN TEXT, AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. <br />The City Counci 1 of the City of Eugene finds as fo11 ows: <br />1. The Metropolitan Industrial Lands Special Study was initiated in <br />January, I989, to answer some long-standing questions about the demand for <br />and supply of industrial sites in the Metropolitan Area and to u date the <br />~ ndustr~ al ]ands ort i on of p <br />p the Metrapol ~ tan Area General Plan . <br />~. The Metropolitan Industrial Lands Special Study is tom osed of two <br />components. The inventor re o p <br />y p rt includes a detailed descr~pt~on of the <br />Special Study's purpose, background and methodology, economic trends Comm - <br />nity objectives, and lon -term Indust ' u <br />g rzal lands supply and demand. It pro- <br />vides information in support of the policy recommendations re ort. The ' <br />,p pol~- <br />cy recommendations report analyzes the policy framework fvr ~ndustr~al land <br />allocations, evaluates the development potential of sites throu hout th <br />metro of i tan area and i n ~ g e <br />p cl udes a f ~ nd~ ngs, concl us ~ ons and a serf es of i m- <br />plementat~on strategies, <br />3. A citizen advisory committee known as the S ecial Stud' ' <br />Commit p , yes Advisory <br />tee reviewed and revised the Metrapol~tan Industrial Lands S ecial <br />Study draft inventor and olic p <br />Y p •y recommendations reports, They were the <br />subject of a ~o~nt public hearing before the S rin field Lane Count <br />Eu ene P1 p g ~ y, and <br />•g ann~ng Commissions, review and revision by the Joint Plannin Com- <br />m~ss~on Committee further review • •g • <br />s <br />by each of the three planning comm~ss~ons, <br />and a joint public hearing before the governin bodies of S rin field <br />Count and g p g Lane <br />y, Eugene. <br />4. The Eugene, Springfield, and <br />ommended approval of the inventory and <br />support material far implementation of <br />ority Twa Implementation Strategies in <br />Lane County Planning Commissions rec- <br />pol i cy recommendations reports as <br />the recommended Priority One and Pri- <br />the policy recommendations report. <br />5. The Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County Plannin Commissions rec- <br />ommended ado ton of g <br />p four text amendments to the Metropolitan Area General <br />Plan, as shaven ~n Exh~b~t 6 ~ncorparated herein b reference, These fo <br />Y ur <br />amendments are included as Pr~or~ty One Strategies la throw h Id in the o '- <br />g p li <br />cy recommendations report. The implementation strategies also include initi- <br />ation of Metropolitan Area General Plan diagram deli nation chap es and zone <br />than es to resolve ~ g g <br />g, Plan/zone conflicts, init~at~on of amendments to the Met- <br />ropol~tan Area General Plan and zoning maps based on recommendations in the <br />site evaluation matrices, and amendments to Eugene's I-1 and I-~ industri <br />al <br />zoning district provisions, All but the four Metropolitan Area General Plan <br />text amendments wi 1 l be the subject of further public heari n s and ma be <br />modified as a res 1 g y <br />u t of those hears ngs . <br />Ordinance - 1 <br />