Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />7. Commercial dCYlclopmcnt should be at an intensity or Icv'cI of usc consistent <br />.,'"lith Rcsidcntial/Profcssional eRP) or Neighborhood Commercial eC 1) which <br />in turn .,";:ould be compatible \-;ith adjacent residential dc,\rclopment <br /> <br />Commercial development should be at an intensity or level of use consistent <br />with Neighborhood Commercial (C-l) or Community Commercial (C-2) which <br />in turn would be compatfble with adjacent residential development. <br /> <br />8. Effooti";e screening, berms or landscapmg should be provided along all <br />arterials BeltIine Road, Barger .&\:vcnuc, and High.,vay 99 North in an effort <br />to miBimize existing and future Bcgatiy;c impacts from these arterials. <br /> <br />9. A profile of existing residential development should be considered. <br /> <br />Understanding that future residential development will be medium and high <br />density in nature, least dense development in the development node study" <br />area should occur near existing single-family developments with. higher <br />densities closer to Barger Avenue. Appropriate setback and screening must <br />be considered between Barger Avenue and proposed development within the <br />study area. <br /> <br />10. A mixture of housing types and number of bedrooms per unit should be <br />considered <br /> <br />11. Development options should be considered, including establishment of phase <br />lines bases on a comprehensive plan for the area. <br /> <br />The study site contains approximately 100 acres; such a development would <br />not be within the feasibility of a single, small developer. <br /> <br />12. PlaBned uBit development procedures should be used t<l rewc",,\p residential <br />developmeRt <br /> <br />Based on the intensity of future development within the development node, <br />and its impact on existing developed adjacent land and traffic concerns, site <br />review procedures should provide an adequate process for reviewing future <br />development within the COmmercially and Residentially designated areas. <br /> <br />13. Based OD the intensity of future developmeBt within the de\'elopment Bode, <br />and its impact OD eKistiBg developed adjacent land au.d traffic concerns, site <br />reviev.9 prooedures should prmide ail adequate prooess for reviewing futUre <br />de,~lopment within the "RP or C 1 ZOBiBg districts and their proximity txO <br />existing and proposed land 'Uscs. II <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />1-23 <br />