Ordinance No. 19953 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.~-~~ .Policies 1 and 2, page llr«B-4 are supportive of existing and new businesses that use the resident labor force. Ex ansion of Je 's will rovide additional 'obs far local residents. P ~y P ~ Policy 5, page llt-B-S directs that sufficient adjacent land should be provided to allow existing industrial activities to expand. The amendment responds directly to this policy. Policy S, page Ill-B-S encourages the improvement of the appearance of existing industrial areas. The proposed site review criteria will achieve this policy. Metro Phan Amendment, Criteria 3 - Amendmen#s classified as update amendments must be initiated by the governing bodies of ail three jurisdictions. This amendment is not classified as an update amendment and therefore, does not require initiation by all. three ~ urisdicdons. A classification determination for this amendment was done by the Planning Division on Qctober 25, 1993, consistent with the procedure outline in the Eugene Code. This amendment was classif ed as a minor amendment. A plan update amendment is defined as a change to the Metro Plan that: 1} changes the urban growth boundary ar j urisdicdonal boundary of the Plan; 2} requires an exception to a statewide planning goal; 3} amends a fundamental principle, goal or policy set out in Chapter II of the Plan; or 4) requires a substantial diversion of budgeted resources from approved work programs of affected city departments. The site in this request is located inside the urban growth boundary and the jurisdictional boundary of the Metro Plan and does not involve any changes to either of the boundaries. This amendment does not involve an ~ exce don to be taken under statewide .planning goal ~ P since no resource lands are involved and the requested amendment involves a small area. The impact of the requested change would be limned to the immediate area. . This amendment does not require the amendment of a fundamental principle or a metropolitan goal or policy in the Metro Plan. A, substantial diversion of planning resources from a roved work ro rams of the Plannin and Develo meet Department or other city PP P g g P 'departments will not result from this request. The area of this proposed amendment is witiun the stud area boundaries of the Ai rt Vicini IH 99 Study ~AVIH99 Study}. This study Y ~ tY wY is now underway. Staff has already completed preliminary research and analysis of this issue YISED STAFF NOTES -- Decem x 2, 1993 age 15