Laserfiche WebLink
Acts exceeding an official's authority, such as incorrectly granting a waiver of assessment <br />here, do not create an estoppel. See, e, g., Bankus v. City of Brookings, 252 Or. 257, <br />449 P.2d 646 ~ 1969; Solber v. Cit of Newber , 56 Or. App. 23, 641 P.2d 44 ~ 1982. <br />A tax case found that estoppel could exist where there was misinformation by staff, a <br />valid reason for reliance, and a resultant high degree of inequity, Johnson v. Tax <br />Commission, 248 Or. 460, 435 P.2d 302 ~1967y, but other than misinformation those <br />elements are not evident here. The acknowledged erroneous representation here does not <br />create a basis for exempting this property from assessment. <br />inancin Low-In,,.,, <br />g;___ , „ ,,,,,cpme Property.,,,Dwners <br />All properties to be assessed will be eligible for 10-year assessment financing. Low- <br />income deferral programs are also available for those property owners that qualify, and <br />this is the appropriate method of addressing Mr. Pringle's concerns. Qualification will be <br />determined at the time the financing application is processed. <br />The final assessments costs to property owners are equal to the estimates provided at the <br />hearing on formation of the LID. Uvhile actual project costs are higher than those <br />estimates, all cost increases are proposed to be absorbed by the City. The Hearings <br />Official recommends approval of the proposed calculation of the assessment perfront foot <br />for property owners within the LID. <br />The Hearings Official also finds that he project is one for which the assessments are for <br />a local improvement as set forth in ORS 310,410 because: <br />~ 1 ~ The assessments do not exceed actual costs; <br />42~ The assessments are imposed for a capital construction project which <br />provides a specific benefit for a specific property or rectifies the problem <br />caused by a specific property; <br />~3~ The assessments are impased in a single assessment upon completion of <br />the project; and <br />t4~ The assessments allow the property owners to elect to pay the assessment <br />with interest over at least ten ~ 10~ years. <br />Therefore, the Hearings Official recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance for <br />assessment as set forth by the City Engineer. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />~.~..,R.e, n,bt~Q. <br />Michael C. INalch <br />Hearings Official <br />Dated: February 25, 1994 <br />Sidewalks on Emerald Street -Job #2844 <br />Findings and Recommendations -Page 4 <br />