Ordinance No. 19978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P. Based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the public testimony before the Commission and this Council, and staff notes and back round . g materials, the City Counc~I has determined that the May 1994 Draft Whiteaker Plan is consistent with the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, as acknowled ed g by the Land Conservation and Development Commission, and consequently, the Whiteaker Plan conforms to applicable statewide planning goals. NGV~', THEREFORE, THE CITY GF EUGENE DOES gRDAIN AS FGLLaWS: Section 1. Based an the above findings, and the findings set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which are hereby adopted, and subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 4 and 5, the 'L~hiteaker Plan attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference, including the policies set forth therein, is hereby adopted as a refinement of the Eugene-Springfield Metro olitan Area p General Plan. Section 2. The supporting text, maps, graphs, and tables contained in the Whiteaker Plan and the Whiteaker Plan Appendix are also adopted as additional findings. Section 3. The Plan Diagram included in the Whiteaker Plan, as revised in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby adopted as a refinement of the Eugene-Springfield Metro olitan Area p General Plan. The explanatory text discussing the Plan Diagram des~gnatlons and subareas is intended to clarify and provide further explanation of the intent of the Metro Plan iagram. Section 4. The implementation strategies set forth in the Whiteaker Plan are recognized as potential ideas on how to address the policies, but are not adopted as Ci tY pahcy. Section 5. The list of Planning Commission Short-Term Implementation Priorities attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein by reference is recognized as providing direction for the timing of implementation activities. It is recognized, however, that several factors will impact implementation, including project complexity and bud et constraints . g Section 6, If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of com etent . P jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Section 7. Grdinance Nos. 194bo,19G78, and 19833 are hereby repealed, Section 8. That the matters contained herein concern the public welfare an safety ordinance - 3