Ordinance No. 20022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

unoccupied and undeveloped parcel, The lack of evidence that the suggested alternatives could be any more fairly applied than the present method does not matter; however, the front foota e g method ~s the method provided m the Eugene Code, and the assessments in this matter are calculated according to the Eugene Code, Unless and until the City Council provides for a different method, the front footage method is the only method of assessment available to the City, Mr, Piculell did not argue that the proposed assessment for his property was incorrectly calculated if the distinction between developed and undeveloped property is correct, he on1 .. ., y argued that the distinction is incorrect. Suace Mr. P~culell has not shown that the ordinance is being incorrectly interpreted, no change is recommended to Mr, Piculell's prope 's assessment. Nothing discussed in the public hearing provides any reason to alter the recommendation that the Council adopt an ordinance levying the assessments as calculated. The Hearings official finds that notice of the public hearing was provided in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Eugene Code, and that all property owners were provided an opportunity to participate in the proceedings. Although one property owner has objected, for the reasons stated above, the Hearin s Df~cial g recommends that the final assessable costs be assessed on all properties in the LID as provided in the proposed assessments. The Hearings ~f~cial also finds that the project is one for which the assessments are for local improvement as set forth in CRS 310.410 because: 1. The assessments do not exceed actual casts; ~. The assessments are imposed far a capital construction project which ravides a p spec~~c benefit for a specific property or rectifies the problem caused by a specil~c property; 3. The assessments are imposed in a single assessment upon completion o the project; and 4, The assessments allow the property owners to elect to pay the assessment with interest over at least ten X10} years. FINAL ASSESSMENT FAR PAVING, CURBS, GUTTERS SIDEWALKS STQRM SEWERS AND STREET LIGHTS ON TERRY STREET BETWEEN RQYAL AVENUE AND BARGER DRIVE PAGE 4