Laserfiche WebLink
The assessable unit costs listed below were based on the low bids received prior to <br />construction and were quoted to property owners at the LID hearing following the bid <br />opening. <br />20-foot <br />36-foot <br />44-foot <br />Sidewalks <br />Cost to City; <br />$ 46.23/front foot <br />$ 83.22/front foot <br />$ 101.71/front foot <br />$ 17.95/front foot <br />$386,H44.73 <br />The final assessment unit costs are lower than the estimates quoted a the time of the formation <br />of the LID. <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />A public hearing was held on the matter on July 25,1995. Minutes of the public hearin are <br />.. . g <br />attached as Exh~b~t A. At the public hearing staff presented a memorandum to the Hearings <br />Official describing the project and made a verbal presentation describing the project and the <br />final assessment. A copy of the staff memorandum is attached as Exhibit B. <br />One property owner attended the hearing, Mr. Arthur Piculell challenged the proposed <br />assessment, claiming that it was based on misreading an ambiguous provision of the Eugene <br />Code. The provision of the Eugene Code in question is section 7.1752}fib} 1. a. The Code <br />provides: <br />. ~~ e~~,n~~~s~n~,~~~~~~. <br />a. As provided in subsection 7.1751}fib}, the city shall pay the cost of <br />street construction in excess of the maximum assessable width for a street. That width <br />varies on the basis of street classification at the place of construction, and the zonin <br />g <br />and use of land abuttHag the street at the place of construction in accordance with the <br />following; <br />~l} Parcels in residential zoning districts may be assessed for a <br />maximum of 3G feet of an improvement and for paving of a thickness <br />determined by the city engineer, on the basis of standard's of the Oregon State <br />Highway Division or the Asphalt Institute, to be adequate for residential traffic; <br />except that properties used for existing single family dwellings and existing <br />duplexes may be assessed for a maximum width as follows: <br />~a} Parcels abutting arterial or collector streets may be assessed for a <br />maximum of 20 feet of width. <br />FINAL ASSESSMENT FOR PAVING, CURBS, GUTTERS SIDEWALKS STORM SEWERS AND STREET <br />LIGHTS ON TERRY STREET BETWEEN ROYAL AVENUE AND BARGER DRIVE PAGE 2 <br />